首页> 外文期刊>Neuro-ophthalmology >Clinical versus Evidence-based Rehabilitation Options for Post-stroke Visual Impairment
【24h】

Clinical versus Evidence-based Rehabilitation Options for Post-stroke Visual Impairment

机译:临床与循证式视觉损伤的临床康复选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to identify which treatments for post-stroke visual impairment have a supportive evidence base, and which are being used in practice without supportive evidence. A systematic review of the literature reporting on the available treatment options was compared against the visual treatments used in the Vision In Stroke (VIS) study. Treatments were identified for visual field, visual neglect, visual perception and ocular motility disorders. Visual scanning therapies for hemianopia and neglect have an established evidence base. However, a number, such as typoscopes and advice options, have limited detail of their effectiveness and require further research.
机译:本研究的目的是确定对中风后视力视力障碍的哪些治疗有一个支持性的证据基础,并且在没有支持性证据的情况下正在实践中使用。 将文献报告的系统审查与中风(VIS)研究中的视觉中使用的视觉治疗进行了系统审查。 确定视野,视觉疏忽,视觉感知和眼睛运动障碍的治疗方法。 对血液差的视觉扫描疗法,忽视具有既定的证据基础。 然而,一个数字,例如错字和建议选择,其有效性有限并需要进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号