首页> 外文期刊>Addictive behaviors >It depends on when you ask: Motives for using marijuana assessed before versus after a marijuana use event
【24h】

It depends on when you ask: Motives for using marijuana assessed before versus after a marijuana use event

机译:这取决于您何时询问:大麻使用事件前后对比评估的大麻使用动机

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Marijuana use motives are typically evaluated retrospectively using measures that summarize or generalize across episodes of use, which may compromise validity. Using Ecological Momentary Assessment data, we examined the main reason for a specific marijuana use event measured both prospectively and retrospectively. We then determined reason types, event characteristics, and user characteristics that predicted change in reason. Methods: Thirty-six medical outpatients age 15 to 24 years who used marijuana two times a week or more used a handheld computer to select their main reason for use from the five categories of the Marijuana Motives Measure (Simons, Correia, & Carey, 1998) just before and after each time they used marijuana over two weeks (n= 263 events with before/after reason). The reasons were examined individually and according to dimensions identified in motivational models of substance use (positiveegative, internal/external). Results: The reason assessed before use changed to a different reason after use for 20% of events: 10% of events for pleasure; 21%, to cope; 35%, to be more social; 55%, to expand my mind; and 100%, to conform. In the multivariable model, external and expansion reasons each predicted change in reason for use (p<. 0.0001 and p= 0.001, respectively). Youth were also more likely to change their reason if older (p= 0.04), if male (p= 0.02), and with weekend use (p= 0.002). Conclusion: Retrospective assessments of event-specific motives for marijuana use may be unreliable and therefore invalid for a substantial minority of events, particularly if use is for external or expansion reasons.
机译:背景:大麻的使用动机通常是通过对使用情况进行汇总或归纳的措施进行回顾性评估的,这可能会影响有效性。使用生态矩评估数据,我们检查了前瞻性和回顾性测量的特定大麻使用事件的主要原因。然后,我们确定了预测原因变化的原因类型,事件特征和用户特征。方法:36名年龄在15至24岁的门诊患者,每周两次或两次以上使用大麻,使用手提电脑从五种大麻动机措施中选择使用大麻的主要原因(Simons,Correia和Carey,1998年) ),他们每次在两周内使用大麻之前和之后(n = 263个事件,含之前/之后的原因)。根据物质使用动机模型(积极/消极,内部/外部)中确定的维度,对原因进行了单独检查。结果:20%的事件使用前评估的原因变为使用后的不同原因:10%的事件是娱乐; 21%,应付; 35%,更加社交; 55%,扩大我的视野;和100%符合。在多变量模型中,外部和扩展原因各自预测使用原因的变化(分别为p <.0.0001和p = 0.001)。如果年龄较大(p = 0.04),如果男性(p = 0.02)和周末使用(p = 0.002),则青年也更有可能改变其原因。结论:对使用大麻的事件特定动机的回顾性评估可能是不可靠的,因此对于少数事件(尤其是出于外部或扩展原因而使用)无效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号