首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Comparison Between the Use of Ropivacaine Alone and Ropivacaine With Sufentanil in Epidural Labor Analgesia
【24h】

Comparison Between the Use of Ropivacaine Alone and Ropivacaine With Sufentanil in Epidural Labor Analgesia

机译:单独使用Ropivaine和罗哌卡因在硬膜外分娩镇痛中的罗哌卡因的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of the sole local anesthetic ropivacaine with the combination of both local anesthetic ropivacaine and opioidergic analgesic sufentanil given epidurally on the labor pain control.After institutional review board approval and patient consent, a total of 500 nulliparas requesting epidural labor analgesia were enrolled and 481 eventually were randomized into 2 groups: a sole local anesthetic group (ropivacaine 0.125%) and a combination of local anesthetic and opioidergic analgesic group (0.125% ropivacaine+0.3g/mL sufentanil). After the test dose, a 10-mL epidural analgesic solution was given in a single bolus, followed by intermittent bolus injection of 10 to 15mL of the solution. The primary outcome was the analgesic efficacy measured using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) of pain. Other maternal and infant variables were evaluated as secondary outcomes.A total of 346 participants completed the study. The median NRS pain score during the 1st stage of labor was significantly lower in the combination group 2.2 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.8-2.7) comparing to the sole local analgesic group 2.4 (IQR: 2.0-2.8) (P<0.0001). No significant difference was observed in NRS pain score prior epidural analgesia and during the 2nd stage of labor. Patients in both groups rated same satisfaction of analgesia. Patients in the sole local analgesic group experienced fewer side effects than those in the combination group (37.7% vs 47.2%, P=0.082). The individual analgesia-related cost in the sole local analgesic group was less ($5.72.06) than that in the combination group ($9.76 +/- 3.54) (P<0.0001). The incidence of 1-minute Apgar 7 was lower in the sole local analgesic group 2 (1.2%) than the combination group 10 (5.5%) (P=0.038). No difference was found between other secondary outcomes.The sole local anesthetic ropivacaine produces a comparable labor analgesic effect as the combination of both local anesthetic ropivacaine and opioidergic analgesic sufentanil at different stages of labor ((NRS)=0.2) but the former has less side effects, lower cost, and less incidence of lower 1-minute Apgar scoring. These results imply the necessity of a systematic reevaluation of epidural labor analgesia with sole local anesthetics against combination regimens of local anesthetics and other opioids.
机译:比较唯一局部麻醉Ropivacaine与局部麻醉Ropivacaine和Opioidergic Anbugesic Sufentanil的镇痛疗效和安全性,透明在劳动疼痛控制上给予杂志。制度审查委员会审批和患者同意,共有500种申请硬膜外劳动力注册镇痛和481最终被随机分为2组:唯一的局部麻醉组(Ropivacaine 0.125%)和局部麻醉剂和Opioidic镇痛基团的组合(0.125%Ropivacaine + 0.3g / ml sufentanil)。试验剂量后,在单个推注中给出10ml硬膜外镇痛溶液,然后在间歇注入10至15ml溶液中。主要结果是使用疼痛的数值评定量表(NRS)测量的镇痛效果。其他母婴变量被评估为二次结果。总共346名参与者完成了这项研究。在劳动组的第1阶段的第1阶段中的中位数NRS疼痛评分显着低于唯一的局部镇痛组2.4(IQR:2.0-2.8)(P <0.0001)(P <0.0001)(P <0.0001) 。在NRS疼痛评分之前没有显着差异,并在第二阶段劳动期间。两组患者对镇痛感应相同。唯一的局部镇痛组患者的副作用较少,而不是组合组的副作用(37.7%vs 47.2%,p = 0.082)。唯一局部镇痛组中的个体镇痛相关成本较少(5.72.06美元),而不是组合组(9.76美元+/- 3.54)(P <0.0001)。唯一的局部镇痛组2(1.2%)的1分钟APGAR 7的发病率低于组合第10组(5.5%)(P = 0.038)。在其他二次结果之间没有发现差异。唯一的局部麻醉罗哌卡因在不同阶段((NRS)= 0.2)下,局部麻醉剂镇痛效果作为局部麻醉Ropivacaine和Opioidergic镇痛Sufentanil的组合((NRS)= 0.2),但前者具有更少的一面效果,较低的成本,较少的发病率降低1分钟的APGAR评分。这些结果意味着具有唯一局部麻醉剂对局部麻醉剂和其他阿片类药物组合方案的唯一局部麻醉品的系统重新评估的必要性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Medicine.》 |2015年第43期|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Nanjing Med Univ Nanjing Matern &

    Child Hlth Care Hosp Dept Anesthesiol Nanjing Jiangsu;

    Nanjing Med Univ Nanjing Matern &

    Child Hlth Care Hosp Dept Anesthesiol Nanjing Jiangsu;

    Nanjing Med Univ Nanjing Matern &

    Child Hlth Care Hosp Dept Anesthesiol Nanjing Jiangsu;

    Nanjing Med Univ Nanjing Matern &

    Child Hlth Care Hosp Dept Anesthesiol Nanjing Jiangsu;

    Nanjing Med Univ Nanjing Matern &

    Child Hlth Care Hosp Dept Anesthesiol Nanjing Jiangsu;

    Nanjing Med Univ Nanjing Matern &

    Child Hlth Care Hosp Dept Anesthesiol Nanjing Jiangsu;

    Nanjing Med Univ Nanjing Matern &

    Child Hlth Care Hosp Dept Anesthesiol Nanjing Jiangsu;

    Nanjing Med Univ Nanjing Matern &

    Child Hlth Care Hosp Dept Anesthesiol Nanjing Jiangsu;

    Nanjing Med Univ Nanjing Matern &

    Child Hlth Care Hosp Inst Pediat Nanjing Jiangsu Peoples R;

    Nanjing Med Univ Nanjing Jiangsu Peoples R China;

    Nanjing Med Univ Nanjing Matern &

    Child Hlth Care Hosp Dept Anesthesiol Nanjing Jiangsu;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 医药、卫生;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号