首页> 外文期刊>Medical Journal Armed Forces India >Ultrasound evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy: Can it reduce the need of histopathology/cytopathology?
【24h】

Ultrasound evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy: Can it reduce the need of histopathology/cytopathology?

机译:宫颈淋巴结病的超声评估:它可以减少组织病理学/缩影病理学的需要吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The differentiation between the causes of cervical lymphadenopathy is of paramount importance as these have different modalities of treatment with varying prognosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of B Mode and colour Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) to differentiate between benign and metastatic lymph nodes. Methods: 100 patients of clinically palpable lymph nodes were evaluated with B Mode and CDUS. B Mode assessment included short-long (S:L) axis ratio, hilum, nodal border, echo-genicity, intranodal necrosis and ancillary features. CDUS assessment included distribution of vascularity, resistive index (RI) and pulsatility index (PI). Statistical analysis was carried out with histopathological or cytological diagnosis as gold standard. Results: B-Mode US correctly diagnosed 22/25 (88%) of the reactive lymph nodes giving it a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 97.3%. Colour Doppler US diagnosed 23/25 (92%) reactive lymph nodes with a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 97.3%. B-Mode underdiagnosed one case each of granulomatous disease and metastasis as reactive node while CDUS missed out two cases of granulomatous disease as reactive lymph node. Conclusion: Individual parameters of B Mode when used alone were not found to be very effective in differentiating benign and malignant lymph nodes. However features of B-Mode combined together as well as color Doppler ultrasound, help in the detection of reactive lymph nodes and can be used as a diagnostic tool with good accuracy. However, they cannot be used as a diagnostic method for metastatic or tubercular nodes and cytopathology/ histopathology remains the gold standard in such situations.
机译:背景:宫颈淋巴结病的原因之间的差异是至关重要的,因为这些具有不同预后的不同治疗方式。本研究的目的是评估B模式和彩色多普勒超声(CDU)在良性和转移性淋巴结之间区分的疗效。方法:用B模式和CDU评价100例临床术后淋巴结患者。 B模式评估包括短龙(S:L)轴比,海洛姆,节点边界,回声遗传,肺部肾病和辅助特征。 CDUS评估包括血管性,电阻指数(RI)和脉动性指数(PI)的分布。用组织病理学或细胞学诊断作为金标准进行统计分析。结果:B模式我们正确诊断为22/25(88%)的反应性淋巴结,其敏感性为88%,特异性为97.3%。彩色多普勒美国诊断为23/25(92%)反应性淋巴结,灵敏度为92%,特异性为97.3%。 B-MODE下降一种粒细胞疾病和转移作为活性节点的一种情况,而CDUS错过了两种肉芽肿疾病作为反应性淋巴结的情况。结论:单独使用时B模式的个体参数未发现在差异良性和恶性淋巴结时非常有效。然而,B模式的特征组合在一起以及彩色多普勒超声波,有助于检测反应性淋巴结,可以用作良好精度的诊断工具。然而,它们不能用作转移性或结核节点的诊断方法,并且细胞病理学/组织病理学仍然是这种情况下的金标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号