...
首页> 外文期刊>Gastroenterology research and practice >Efficacy of Tenofovir-Based Combination Therapy versus Tenofovir Monotherapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Presenting with Suboptimal Responses to Pretreatment: A Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Efficacy of Tenofovir-Based Combination Therapy versus Tenofovir Monotherapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Presenting with Suboptimal Responses to Pretreatment: A Meta-Analysis

机译:基于替诺福韦的组合治疗与胞型乙型肝炎患者对预处理的次磷酸性反应的慢性乙型肝炎患者的疗效:META分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background/Aims. It remains unclear whether tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-(TDF-) based combination therapy produces better outcomes than TDF monotherapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the two regimens by performing a meta-analysis. Methods. A comprehensive literature search was performed on the comparison of TDF-based combination therapy and monotherapy for CHB patients in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Libraries. Both dichotomous and continuous variables were extracted and pooled outcomes were expressed as risk ratio (RR) or standard mean difference (SMD). Results. Nine eligible studies (1089 subjects in total) were included in our analysis. The proportion of patients with undetectable HBV DNA at 24, 48, and 96 weeks were similar between the two comparable groups (62.5% versus 70.9%, P = 0.086; 78.1% versus 83.7%, P = 0.118; 86.4% versus 87.9%, P = 0.626, resp.). HBV DNA reduction, rates of ALT normalization, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) loss, and HBeAg seroconversion were also similar between the two groups. Conclusions. On the current data, TDF-based combination therapy seemed to be no better than those achieved by monotherapy. Further studies are needed to verify this comparison.
机译:背景/目标。仍然尚不清楚藤虫毒性富马酸核苷酸(TDF-)的联合治疗是否比慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者的TDF单药治疗更好的结果。本研究的目的是通过进行META分析来比较两种方案的功效。方法。对PubMed,Embase,Science,科学网站和Cochrane图书馆进行了TDF基组合治疗和单药治疗的基于TDF的组合治疗和单药治疗的综合文献搜索。提取二分和连续变量均提取并汇总结果表达为风险比(RR)或标准平均差异(SMD)。结果。在我们的分析中包含九项合格的研究(总共1089项科目)。两种可比较基团(62.5%与70.9%,P = 0.086,P = 0.086)之间不可检测HBV DNA患者的比例相似。78.1%,p = 0.118; 86.4%与87.9%相比, p = 0.626,RESP。)。 HBV DNA降低,ALT标准化的率,乙型肝炎抗原(HBEAG)损失和HBEAG血清转化在两组之间也相似。结论。在目前的数据上,基于TDF的组合疗法似乎没有比单一疗法实现的组合疗法更好。需要进一步的研究来验证这种比较。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Chongqing Med Univ Affiliated Hosp 2 Key Lab Mol Biol Infect Dis Dept Infect Dis Inst Viral;

    Chongqing Med Univ Affiliated Hosp 2 Key Lab Mol Biol Infect Dis Dept Infect Dis Inst Viral;

    Chongqing Med Univ Affiliated Hosp 2 Key Lab Mol Biol Infect Dis Dept Infect Dis Inst Viral;

    Chongqing Med Univ Affiliated Hosp 2 Key Lab Mol Biol Infect Dis Dept Infect Dis Inst Viral;

    Chongqing Med Univ Affiliated Hosp 2 Key Lab Mol Biol Infect Dis Dept Infect Dis Inst Viral;

    Chongqing Med Univ Affiliated Hosp 2 Key Lab Mol Biol Infect Dis Dept Infect Dis Inst Viral;

    Chongqing Med Univ Affiliated Hosp 2 Key Lab Mol Biol Infect Dis Dept Infect Dis Inst Viral;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 消化系及腹部疾病;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号