首页> 外文期刊>Geographical Journal >Housing, home ownership and the governance of ageing
【24h】

Housing, home ownership and the governance of ageing

机译:住房,房屋所有权和老龄化治理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Active ageing' has become core to ageing policy internationally. This paper argues that housing, and specifically home purchase, is fundamental to the governance of active ageing in liberal welfare states such as Australia, the UK, the US and Canada. Specifically, the paper expands understanding of how neoliberally inflected active ageing agendas are advanced in conjunction with housing consumption, and builds new knowledge of the governance of asset-based welfare, the investor subject, and housing marginality, showing how these practices and identities are governed temporally through ideas about what it means to age well. Arguments are advanced through analysis of Australian government ageing and age-connected housing strategies in the 20 years to 2015. These strategies construct three key connections between housing and ageing. First, housing is framed as a base (or location) for active ageing, with secure, appropriate and affordable housing depicted as enabling participation. Second, home ownership is positioned as an individual responsibility. In this framing home ownership becomes a choice' and means through which individuals can demonstrate responsibility by self-insuring against the fiscal risks of older age. Third, home ownership is connected to the activation of ideal ageing identities by enabling home owners as productive agers (the home as a form of income) and active consumers (home as a resource to fund prudential and age-defying consumption in older age). Significantly, in framing home ownership as an individual responsibility and choice the importance of structural factors shaping housing access are downplayed. This is a question of key geographical significance, foregrounding an interlinked agenda of not just how, but where, ageing should take place.
机译:积极的老龄化“在国际上成为老化政策的核心。本文认为住房和专门的房屋购买是对澳大利亚,英国,美国和加拿大等自由福利国家积极老龄化的治理的基础。具体而言,该论文扩大了对新自由主义的活跃老龄化议程如何与住房消费一起推进的理解,并建立了基于资产的福利,投资者主题和住房边缘的治理的新知识,展示了这些做法和身份的治理方式通过关于它意味着成年的想法的想法。通过分析澳大利亚政府老龄化和年龄与2015年的年龄联合住房策略进行了进展。这些战略在住房和老龄化之间构建了三个关键联系。首先,外壳被诬陷为主动老化的基地(或位置),具有安全,合适的和经济实惠的住房,如支持参与。其次,居所拥有定位为个人责任。在这个框架的房屋所有权中成为一个选择“,并且手段通过自我保险来履行较老年人的财政风险来证明责任。第三,居所拥有通过使房屋拥有富有成效的人(作为收入形式的家庭)和积极的消费者(作为资助审慎和年龄差别消费的资源)来激活理想老龄化身份的激活。显着地,在框架房屋所有权中作为个人责任和选择结构因素塑造住房进入的重要性。这是一个关键地理意义的问题,前景不仅仅是如何,而且在哪里,老龄化应该发生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号