...
首页> 外文期刊>European addiction research >Differential Diagnosis in Patients with Substance Use Disorder and/or Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Using Continuous Performance Test
【24h】

Differential Diagnosis in Patients with Substance Use Disorder and/or Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Using Continuous Performance Test

机译:使用连续性能测试的物质使用障碍和/或注意力/多动障碍患者的鉴别诊断

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Although substance use disorders (SUD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) show significant symptomatic overlap, ADHD is often overlooked in SUD patients. Objective: The aim of the present study was to characterize aspects of attention and inhibition (as assessed by a continuous performance test [CPT]) in SUD patients with and without a comorbid diagnosis of ADHD and in healthy controls, expecting the most severe deficits in patients with a combined diagnosis. Methods: The MOXO-CPT version, which incorporates visual and auditory environmental distractors, was administered to 486 adults, including healthy controls (n = 172), ADHD (n = 56), SUD (n = 150), and combined SUD and ADHD (n = 108). Results: CPT performance of healthy controls was better than that of individuals in each of the 3 clinical groups. The only exception was that the healthy control group did not differ from the ADHD group on the Timing index. The 3 clinical groups differed from each other in 2 indices: (a) patients with ADHD (with or without SUD) showed increased hyperactivity compared to patients with SUD only and (b) patients with ADHD showed more responses on correct timing as compared with the SUD groups (with or without ADHD). Conclusion: The CPT is sensitive to ADHD-related deficits, such as disinhibition, poor timing, and inattention, and is able to consistently differentiate healthy controls from patients with ADHD, SUD, or both. Our results are in line with previous research associating both ADHD and SUD with multiple disruptions across a broad set of cognitive domains such as planning, working memory, decision-making, inhibition control, and attention. The lack of consistent differences in cognitive performance between the 3 diagnostic groups might be attributed to various methodological aspects (e.g., heterogeneity in severity, type, and duration of substances use). Our results support the view that motor activity should be considered a significant marker of ADHD.
机译:背景:虽然物质使用障碍(SUD)和注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)显示出显着的症状重叠,但ADHD通常被忽视在抑菌患者中。目的:本研究的目的是表征关注和抑制​​的方面(如在抑制患者的抑制患者中(连续性能检测[CPT]评估),抑菌患者有没有ADHD和健康对照,期待最严重的赤字患者诊断综合症。方法:将视觉和听觉环境分散组的MoxO-CPT版本施用至486名成人,包括健康对照(N = 172),ADHD(n = 56),sud(n = 150),以及组合sud和adhd (n = 108)。结果:CPT对健康对照的性能优于3种临床组中每种临床组中的个体的性能。唯一的例外是,健康对照组对时序指数的ADHD组没有不同。 3个临床基团在2个指标中彼此不同:(a)与苏打水肿的患者(B)患者的ADHD(有或没有sud)的患者显示出与ADHD患者的患者相比,与...相比, sud组(有或没有adhd)。结论:CPT对adhd相关的赤字敏感,例如诽谤,时序和疏忽,并且能够始终如时地区分患有ADHD,SUD或两者患者的健康对照。我们的结果符合以前的研究,将ADHD和SUD与广泛的认知域中的多种中断相关联,例如规划,工作记忆,决策,抑制控制和注意力。在3个诊断基团之间的认知性能缺乏差异可能归因于各种方法论(例如,严重程度,类型和持续时间使用的异质性)。我们的结果支持该观点,即汽车活动应被视为ADHD的重要标记。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号