...
首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine: eCAM >Influence of First-Line Antibiotics on the Antibacterial Activities of Acetone Stem Bark Extract of Acacia mearnsii De Wild, against Drug-Resistant Bacterial Isolates
【24h】

Influence of First-Line Antibiotics on the Antibacterial Activities of Acetone Stem Bark Extract of Acacia mearnsii De Wild, against Drug-Resistant Bacterial Isolates

机译:一线抗生素对抗耐药细菌分离物的丙酮茎皮切提取物对抗菌细菌分离株的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background. This study was aimed at evaluating the antibacterial activity of the acetone extract of A. mearnsii and its interactions with antibiotics against some resistant bacterial strains. Methods. The antibacterial susceptibility testing was determined by agar diffusion and macrobroth dilution methods while the checkerboard method was used for the determination of synergy between the antibiotics and the extract. Results. The results showed that the susceptibility of the different bacterial isolates was concentration dependent for the extract and the different antibiotics. With the exception of S. marcescens, the inhibition zones of the extract produced by 20mg/mL ranged between 18 and 32 mm. While metronidazole did not inhibit any of the bacterial isolates, all the antibiotics and their combinations, except for ciprofloxacin and its combination, did not inhibit Enterococcus faecalis. The antibacterial combinations were more of being antagonistic than of being synergistic in the agar diffusion assay. From the macrobroth dilution, the extract and the antibiotics exerted a varied degree of inhibitory effect on the test organisms. The MIC values of the acetone extract which are in mg/mL are lower than those of the different antibiotics which are in mug/mL. From the checkerboard assay, the antibacterial combinations showed varied degrees of interactions including synergism, additive, indifference, and antagonism interactions. While antagonistic and additive interactions were 14.44%, indifference interaction was 22.22% and synergistic interaction was 37.78% of the antibacterial combinations against the test isolates. While the additivity/indifference interactions indicated no interactions, the antagonistic interaction may be considered as a negative interaction that could result in toxicity and suboptimal bioactivity. Conclusion. The synergistic effects of the herbal-drug combinations may be harnessed for the discovery and development of more rational evidence-based drug combinations with optimized efficiency in the prevention of multidrug resistance and therapy of multifactorial diseases.
机译:背景。该研究旨在评估A.Mearnsii的丙酮提取物的抗菌活性及其与抗生素对一些抗性细菌菌株的相互作用。方法。通过琼脂扩散和大草稀释方法测定抗菌易感性测试,同时使用棋盘方法来确定抗生素和提取物之间的协同作用。结果。结果表明,不同的细菌分离株的敏感性浓度依赖于提取物和不同的抗生素。除了S. Marcescens,提取物的抑制区由20mg / ml产生的萃取区在18至32mm之间。虽然甲硝唑不抑制任何细菌分离物,但除了环丙沙星及其组合外,所有抗生素及其组合都没有抑制肠球菌粪便。抗菌组合更多是拮抗拮抗作用,而不是在琼脂扩散测定中的协同作用。从Macrobroth稀释,提取物和抗生素对测试生物产生了多种抑制作用程度。丙酮提取物的麦克风提取物的MIC值低于麦克风/ mL中的不同抗生素的麦克风提取物。从棋盘测定中,抗菌组合显示出不同程度的相互作用,包括协同作用,添加剂,漠不关量和拮抗作用。虽然拮抗和添加剂相互作用为14.44%,但瞳孔相互作用为22.22%,并且协同相互作用为针对试验分离株的抗菌组合的37.78%。虽然添加剂/漠直互引起的相互作用没有相互作用,但是拮抗相互作用可以被认为是可能导致毒性和次优生物活性的负相互作用。结论。中草药组合的协同效应可以利用更合理的基于循证药物组合的发现和开发,以防止多药抗性和多重疾病治疗的优化效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号