首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology >Hox genes: studies from the 20th to the 21st century. Preface.
【24h】

Hox genes: studies from the 20th to the 21st century. Preface.

机译:Hox基因:20世纪至21世纪的研究。前言。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Are the Hox genes so important? Frankly, it is but a rhetorical question. In my opinion, the answer is YES, without any doubt. Still, I found it the right place to ask this question at the beginning of the present book. My purpose is here to argue, and try to convince those who may not agree, that the Hox genes are indeed so important that their study will not end with the 20th century.In fact, I do think that the discovery of the homeobox was one among the main scientific events in biology during the second half of the 20th century, together with the structure of the DNA molecule by Watson and Crick and the discovery by Lwoff, Jacob and Monod that the regulation of gene expression was itself genetically determined. I am old enough to remember the shocks that the discovery of the homeobox provoked a quarter of a century ago. Indeed, I can remember what our thoughts were at that time, and how much it changed our way of thinking, in molecular biology, developmental biology and evolutionary biology. In molecular biology, almost everybody at that time was convinced that each transcription factor had to be unique in both structure and sequence to accommodate its specific binding to DNA.
机译:Hox基因如此重要吗?坦白说,这只是一个反问。我认为答案是肯定的。尽管如此,我还是在本书开头问这个问题的合适地方。我的目的是在这里争论,并试图说服那些可能不同意的人,即Hox基因的确如此重要,以至于他们的研究不会在20世纪结束。事实上,我确实认为同源盒的发现是其中之一。在20世纪下半叶生物学的主要科学事件中,还有沃森(Watson)和克里克(Crick)的DNA分子的结构以及Lwoff,Jacob和Monod的发现,基因表达的调节本身是由基因决定的。我已经大到足以记住25年前就发现了同源盒的震撼。的确,我可以记得当时我们的想法,以及它在分子生物学,发育生物学和进化生物学中改变了我们的思维方式。在分子生物学中,当时几乎所有人都相信,每个转录因子在结构和序列上都必须是唯一的,以适应其与DNA的特异性结合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号