首页> 外文期刊>European journal of physics: A journal of the European Physical Society >Investigating male bias in multiple choice questions: contrasting formative and summative settings
【24h】

Investigating male bias in multiple choice questions: contrasting formative and summative settings

机译:调查多项选择题中的男性偏见:对比形成性和总结设置

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Previous studies have claimed that male advantage may arise from multiple choice question (MCQ) types; we have made a detailed evaluation of this hypothesis, finding limited evidence that female students are disadvantaged by MCQs in summative assessment. Additionally, we find no significant evidence of a gender gap around the use of multiple choice-type questions, including variants such as multiple response questions, in formative assessment. Our findings suggest that the use of a MCQ format is not a significant factor in the gender gap in assessment.
机译:以前的研究已经声称,来自多项选择问题(MCQ)类型可能出现男性优势; 我们对这一假设进行了详细的评估,发现了有限的证据表明女学生在总结评估中受到MCQ的不利地位。 此外,我们发现没有多种选择类型问题的性别差距的重要证据,包括形成性评估中的多重响应问题等变体。 我们的研究结果表明,使用MCQ格式并不是评估性别差距的重要因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号