...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of pediatrics >Congenital diaphragmatic eventration and hernia sac compared to CDH with true defects: a retrospective cohort study
【24h】

Congenital diaphragmatic eventration and hernia sac compared to CDH with true defects: a retrospective cohort study

机译:先天性膈肌发生器和疝囊与CDH有真实缺陷:回顾性队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Congenital diaphragmatic eventration (CDE) and congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) with or without hernia sac are three different types of congenital diaphragmatic malformations, which this study evaluates. All surgically treated patients with CDE or Bochdalek type CDH between 2000 and 2016 were included in this retrospective analysis. Demographics, CDH-characteristics, treatment, and clinical outcome were evaluated. In total, 200 patients were included. Patients with an eventration or hernia sac had no significant differences and were compared as patients without a true defect to patients with a true defect. The 1-year survival of patients with a true defect was significantly lower than patients with no true defect (76% versus 97%, p = 0.001). CDH with no true defect had significantly better short-term outcomes than CDH with true defect requiring patch repair. However, at 30 days, they more often required oxygen supplementation (46% versus 26%, p = 0.03) and had a higher recurrence rate (8% versus 0%, p = 0.006) (three eventration and two hernia sac patients). Conclusion: Patients without a true defect seem to have a more similar clinical outcome than CDH patients with a true defect, with a better survival. However, the recurrence rate and duration of oxygen supplementation at 30 days are higher than CDH patients with a true defect.What is Known:center dot Congenital diaphragmatic hernia with or without hernia sac and congenital diaphragmatic eventration (incomplete muscularization) are often treated similarly.center dot Patients with hernia sac and eventration are thought to have a relatively good outcome, but exact numbers are not described.What is New:center dot Congenital diaphragmatic eventration and patients with hernia sac seem to have a more similar clinical outcome than Bochdalek type CDH with a true defect.center dot Patients without a true defect (eventration or hernia sac) have a high recurrence rate.
机译:具有或没有疝囊的先天性膈肌发生(CDE)和先天性膈疝(CDH)是三种不同类型的先天性膈肌畸形,这项研究评估。在此回顾性分析中,所有手术治疗的CDE或Bochdalek型CDH患者均纳入2000和2016之间。评估人口统计学,CDH-特征,治疗和临床结果。总共包括200名患者。患有Afferlation或Hernia Sac的患者没有显着的差异,并且与对具有真实缺陷的患者没有真正缺陷的患者进行比较。患有真正缺陷的患者的1年生存率明显低于无真实缺陷的患者(76%对97%,P = 0.001)。 CDH没有真正的缺陷具有比CDH更好的短期结果,而CDH需要贴片修复的真正缺陷。然而,在30天时,它们更常见需要氧气补充(46%,比率为26%,p = 0.03),并且具有更高的复发率(8%与0%,p = 0.006)(三个疝气和两个疝气囊)。结论:没有真实缺陷的患者似乎具有比CDH患者更相似的临床结果,具有真正的缺陷,生存更好。然而,30天的氧补充的复发率和持续时间高于CDH患者的真正缺陷。已知有或没有疝气和先天性膈肌(不完全肌肉大学)的中心点先天性膈疝(不完全肌肉发射)。中心DOT患者患有疝气和Emberration的患者具有相对良好的结果,但没有描述确切的数字具有真正的缺陷。没有真正缺陷的Center Dot患者(Emberration或Hernia Sac)具有高复发率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号