...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases: Official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology >How to measure quantitative antibiotic use in order to support antimicrobial stewardship in acute care hospitals: a retrospective observational study
【24h】

How to measure quantitative antibiotic use in order to support antimicrobial stewardship in acute care hospitals: a retrospective observational study

机译:如何测量定量抗生素使用,以支持急性护理医院的抗微生物管道:回顾性观察研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A cornerstone of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) is monitoring quantitative antibiotic use. Frequently used metrics are defined daily dose (DDD) and days of therapy (DOT). The purpose of this study was (1) to explore for the hospital setting the possibilities of quantitative data retrieval on the level of medical specialty and (2) to describe factors affecting the usability and interpretation of these quantitative metrics. We performed a retrospective observational study, measuring overall systemic antibiotic use at specialty level over a 1-year period, from December 1st 2014 to December 1st 2015, in one university and 13 non-university hospitals in the Netherlands. We distinguished surgical and non-surgical adult specialties. The association between DDDs, calculated from aggregated dispensing data, and DOTs, calculated from patient-level prescription data, was explored descriptively and related to organizational factors, data sources (prescription versus dispensing data), data registration, and data extraction. Twelve hospitals were able to extract dispensing data (DDD), three of which on the level of medical specialty; 13 hospitals were able to extract prescription data (DOT), 11 of which by medical specialty. A large variation in quantitative antibiotic use was found between hospitals and the correlation between DDDs and DOTs at specialty level was low. Differences between hospitals related to organizational factors, data sources, data registration, and data extraction procedures likely contributed to the variation in quantitative use and the low correlation between DDDs and DOTs. The differences in healthcare organization, data sources, data registration, and data extraction procedures contributed to the variation in reported quantitative use between hospitals. Uniform registration and extraction procedures are necessary for appropriate measurement and interpretation and benchmarking of quantitative antibiotic use.
机译:抗菌管理程序(ASPS)的基石正在监测定量抗生素使用。经常使用的度量定义每日剂量(DDD)和治疗天数(点)。本研究的目的是(1)探索医院的可能性,在医学专业水平和(2)上描述了影响影响这些定量度量的可用性和解释的因素。我们进行了回顾性观察研究,在2014年12月1日至2015年12月1日,在一所大学和13名非大学医院在荷兰的一所大学和13家大学医院,衡量专业水平的整体全身抗生素使用。我们介绍了外科和非手术成人专业。从聚合分配数据计算的DDD之间的关联和从患者级处方数据计算的点,并与组织因素,数据源(处方与分配数据),数据登记和数据提取相关。十二家医院能够提取分配数据(DDD),其中三个在医学专业水平上; 13家医院能够通过医学专业提取以下哪些处方数据(点),其中11个。医院之间发现了定量抗生素用途的大变异,并且特种水平的DDDS和点之间的相关性低。与组织因素,数据源,数据登记和数据提取程序相关的医院之间的差异可能导致定量使用的变化和DDDS和点之间的低相关性。医疗组织,数据源,数据登记和数据提取程序的差异导致了报告的医院数量使用的变化。均匀的登记和提取程序对于适当的测量和解释以及定量抗生素使用的基准是必要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号