首页> 外文期刊>International journal of obstetric anesthesia >Neuraxial labor analgesia is not an independent predictor of perineal lacerations after vaginal delivery of patients with intrauterine fetal demise
【24h】

Neuraxial labor analgesia is not an independent predictor of perineal lacerations after vaginal delivery of patients with intrauterine fetal demise

机译:神经划分的患者宫内胎儿消亡患者的阴道撕裂不是一个独立预测因子

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Highlights ? Neuraxial labor analgesia not a predictor of perineal trauma in this setting. ? Bupivacaine concentration does not affect the incidence of perineal trauma. ? Higher infant weight and lower parity independent risk factors of perineal trauma. Abstract Introduction The role of neuraxial labor analgesia in perineal trauma following live births is controversial, and no studies have assessed the association in women delivering an intrauterine fetal demise. We evaluated the relationship between neuraxial labor analgesia and perineal laceration in these patients. Methods This was a retrospective case-control study of women with a diagnosis of fetal death after 20weeks of gestation, a vaginal delivery, and an Apgar score of 0 at delivery, during the period from January 2007 through December 2015. The presence of a perineal laceration and its severity, graded from grade I to IV based on the 2014 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines, was recorded. Results A total of 329/422 (78%) patients received neuraxial, and 93/422 (22%) non-neuraxial, labor analgesia. A perineal laceration occurred in 23% in the neuraxial versus 10% in the non-neuraxial analgesia group, a difference of 13% (95% CI of difference 4% to 20%, P =0.005). After adjusting for confounder bias, greater birthweight (OR 4.22, 95% CI 3.00 to 5.92, P P =0.009), but not neuraxial analgesia (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.47 to 3.57, P =0.61) were independent predictors of perineal laceration. The maintenance concentration of bupivacaine did not affect the rate of perineal injury. Conclusions Neuraxial labor analgesia does not appear to be an independent risk for a perineal laceration in patients with intrauterine fetal demise. Our data suggests that the use of neuraxial analgesia should not raise concern about increased rates of perineal injury.
机译:强调 ?神经治疗镇痛不是这种环境中Perineal创伤的预测因子。还Bupivacaine浓度不会影响Perineal创伤的发病率。还婴儿重量较高,较低的白宫创伤的独立危险因素。摘要引言神经肾上腺镇痛在活产后的神经劳动镇痛的作用是有争议的,并且没有研究评估患有宫内胎儿的妇女的关联。我们评估了这些患者中神经治疗镇痛和面部内裂伤的关系。方法这是对妊娠20周后患者诊断胎儿死亡,阴道分娩和2015年12月期间的孕胎死亡诊断胎儿死亡诊断的回顾性案例控制研究。患有会膜的存在记录了撕裂及其严重程度,根据2014年美国妇产科医院和妇科学家指导评级,从等级到IV等级。结果总共329/422(78%)患者接受神经患者,93/422(22%)非神经治疗镇痛。在非神经镇痛组中,神经衰减的10%在23%中发生了一次会阴撕裂,差异为13%(差异为4%至20%,P = 0.005)。调整混淆偏差后,更高的出生体重(或4.22,95%CI至5.92,P P = 0.009),但不是神经镇痛(或1.29,95%CI 0.47至3.57,P = 0.61)是受机会损伤的独立预测因子。 Bupivacaine的维持浓度不影响会阴损伤率。结论神经危险镇痛似乎并未成为宫内胎儿胎儿患者的会阴撕裂的独立风险。我们的数据表明,使用神经镇痛不应引起对会阴损伤率提高的担忧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号