‘Mind the gap’ in fitness-for-service assessment procedures-review and summary of a recent workshop
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping >‘Mind the gap’ in fitness-for-service assessment procedures-review and summary of a recent workshop
【24h】

‘Mind the gap’ in fitness-for-service assessment procedures-review and summary of a recent workshop

机译:在健身评估程序中“思想差距” - 审查和概述最近的研讨会

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Abstract‘Mind the gap’ in Fitness-for-Service (FFS) assessment procedureswas a workshop held at The University of Manchester in June 2015. The goal of the workshop was firstly to identify ‘knowledge gaps’ or areas for improvement in FFS assessment procedures and, secondly, to present methodologies that have been developed to narrow these gaps. It was intended that identification of these ‘gaps’ would allow an understanding of the current development needs for defect tolerance arguments in the FFS assessment procedures. The following questions were addressed: 1) What are the main ‘knowledge gaps’ in current FFS assessment procedures and methodologies? 2) What are the main barriers that need to be overcome in order to narrow these ‘gaps’? 3) What are the current procedures (if any) and why are these not useful, over- or under-conservative and what needs to be improved? 4) What research is currently ongoing in order to narrow the gaps? This paper summarises the presentations and discussions at the workshop on subjects such as environmentally assisted cracking mechanisms, creep, welding residual stresses and fracture mechanics.Highlights?Knowledge gaps in defect assessment by using fitness-for-service procedures are highlighted.?Issues related to creep, fracture, corrosion fatigue, environmentally assisted fatigue, Welding Residual Stresses are covered.?Some recent efforts focused in addressing these knowledge gaps are described.]]>
机译:<![CDATA [ 抽象 'ince在健身服务中的差距(ffs)评估程序是2015年6月在曼彻斯特大学举行的研讨会。研讨会的目标首先是识别“知识差距”或改善FFS评估程序的领域,其次是呈现出制定的方法缩小这些差距。旨在识别这些“差距”将允许了解FFS评估程序中的缺陷宽容争论的当前发展需求。以下问题已解决:1)目前FFS评估程序和方法中主要的“知识差距”是什么? 2)为了缩小这些“空白”,需要克服的主要障碍是什么? 3)目前的程序(如果有的话)是什么?为什么这些没有有用,过于保守,以及需要改进的内容? 4)目前正在进行哪些研究以缩小差距?本文总结了在诸如环保开裂机制,蠕变,焊接残留应力和骨折力学等主题上的演示和讨论。 亮点 通过使用适合服务程序突出的缺陷评估中的知识间隙被突出显示。 与蠕变,骨折,腐蚀相关的问题疲劳,环保疲劳,焊接残余应力。 < / ce:list-item> 最近的一些努力集中注意力在寻址这些知识中,描述了差距。 ]]>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号