首页> 外文期刊>International journal of law and management >Administrative disciplinary and grievance procedures for public employees in Kuwait and UK
【24h】

Administrative disciplinary and grievance procedures for public employees in Kuwait and UK

机译:科威特和英国公共雇员的行政纪律和委托程序

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to clarify the importance of the system of administrative disciplinary procedures against the public employee in the State of Kuwait and the UK in light of the laws regulating the work in the public sector and, in particular, the statement of the disciplinary procedures that the public employee is subjected to. Design/methodology/approach - This research paper will examine the disciplinary procedures in Kuwait and the UK as follows: disciplinary procedures in Kuwait and disciplinary procedures in UK, which consists of ; disciplinary procedures in the UK, disciplinary penalties in UK, grievance procedures in the UK, failure to follow the disciplinary procedures in the UK and standard procedure of discipline in the UK. Findings - The duties and privileges of public employees stipulated in the Kuwait Civil Service Law are not sufficiently balanced as the penalties for higher ranked employees are lesser than those of employees in the lower rank. Public employees in the State of Kuwait need the establishment of an independent administrative court with its specialty and its own nature. There is also a need for a detailed list that specifies all the civil disciplinary offences. The discipline procedures in the UK are preferable than that in Kuwait Originality/value - The stages of discipline procedures for an offending employee have serious consequences and will affect the productivity of the work. Administrative investigation procedures may require public employees to be suspended from employment or have their employment terminated. It is, therefore, imperative for the administration to brief the public employee about all disciplinary actions that may be taken against him or her. As a consequence, the employee referred for an administrative investigation would be able to exercise his/her right to a fair trial and defend himself/herself.
机译:目的 - 本研究的目的是澄清在科威特国和英国的行政纪律手段制度的重要性,鉴于规范公共部门工作的法律,特别是声明公共雇员受到的纪律程序。设计/方法/方法 - 本研究文件将审查科威特和英国的纪律程序如下:在英国科威特和纪律程序中的纪律程序,包括;英国的纪律程序,英国的纪律处罚,英国的申诉程序,未能遵循英国的纪律程序和英国的标准程序。调查结果 - 科威特公务员法律规定的公共雇员的职责和特权并没有足够平衡,因为对更高的雇员的处罚比较低级别的员工的处罚较小。科威特国的公共雇员需要建立一个独立的行政法院,其专业及其自然。还需要一个详细的列表,指定所有民事违规违法行为。英国的纪律程序是优选的,而不是科威特原创/价值 - 违规员工的纪律程序的阶段具有严重后果,并会影响工作的生产力。行政调查程序可能要求公开雇员被暂停就业或终止就业。因此,管理局必须向公共雇员简要介绍所有可能采取对他或她的纪律处分。因此,提到行政调查的员工将能够行使他/她的权利,并审判并捍卫自己。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号