...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of colorectal disease. >A national evaluation of the management practices of hemorrhoidal disease in the Netherlands
【24h】

A national evaluation of the management practices of hemorrhoidal disease in the Netherlands

机译:荷兰痔疮症管理实践的国家评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose In this study, we describe current practices in the management of hemorrhoidal disease in the Netherlands. Methods A validated online survey was performed among Dutch surgeons and residents treating hemorrhoidal disease. Contact details were retrieved from the Dutch Association for Surgery resulting in 619 contacts. Only doctors who were treating hemorrhoidal disease regularly were asked to complete the questionnaire. The following items were assessed: initial treatment, recurrence, complications, and follow-up. Results In total, 133 respondents completed the survey. Ninety percent of the respondents started with rubber band ligation (RBL) as the first treatment in low-grade hemorrhoidal disease. In case of recurrence, 64% of the respondents repeated RBL three times before switching to a more invasive treatment modality. In grade III hemorrhoidal disease, the respondents preferred more invasive techniques: a sutured hemorrhoidopexy was performed in 24%, Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation (DG-HAL) in 9%, stapled hemorrhoidopexy in 19%, and the traditional hemorrhoidectomy in 31% of the patients, respectively. The majority of the respondents (39%) reported a mild complication in 5–10% of the patients. The most reported complication was pain. Nearly all the respondents (98%) reported a major complication in less than 5% of the patients. The majority of the patients (57%) were seen in outpatient clinics 6?weeks post-treatment. Conclusion This Dutch survey showed areas of common practice for primary treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. However, it also demonstrated varying practices regarding recurrent hemorrhoidal disease. Practical guidelines are required to support colorectal surgeons in the Netherlands.
机译:目的在这项研究中,我们描述了荷兰痔疮患者管理的现行实践。方法验证的在线调查是在荷兰外科医生和治疗痔疮疾病中进行的在线调查。从荷兰语协会检索联系方式,从而导致619个联系人。经常治疗痔疮疾病的医生被要求完成调查问卷。评估以下项目:初始治疗,复发,并发症和随访。结果总计,133名受访者完成了调查。百分之九十的受访者开始于橡皮筋连接(RBL)作为低等级痔病的第一次治疗。在复发的情况下,64%的受访者在切换到更具侵入性治疗方式之前重复RBL三次。在III级痔疮疾病中,受访者优选更多的侵入性技术:缝合血管内发作以9%,令人束缚的痔核在19%的甜食血管内切除,19%,传统痔切除术31%以31%进行了24%的痔疮膜。患者分别。大多数受访者(39%)报告了5-10%的患者的温和并发症。报道的并发症最痛苦。几乎所有受访者(98%)报告了不到5%的患者的主要并发症。大多数患者(57%)在门诊诊所6?周后治疗。结论该荷兰调查显示出常见治疗痔疮疾病的常见做法。然而,它还表现出关于复发性痔病疾病的不同做法。实用的指导方针是支持荷兰的结肠直肠外科医生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号