...
首页> 外文期刊>Intensive care medicine >Nasal high-flow preoxygenation for endotracheal intubation in the critically ill patient: a randomized clinical trial
【24h】

Nasal high-flow preoxygenation for endotracheal intubation in the critically ill patient: a randomized clinical trial

机译:鼻腔内插管的鼻腔高流量预氧化患者:随机临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PurposePreoxygenation with high-flow therapy by nasal cannulae (HFNC) is now widespread in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, no large randomized study has assessed its relevance in non-severely hypoxemic patients. In a randomized controlled trial (PROTRACH study), we aimed to evaluate preoxygenation with HFNC vs. standard bag-valve mask oxygenation (SMO) in non-severely hypoxemic patients during rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in the ICU.MethodsRandomized controlled trial including non-severely hypoxemic patients requiring intubation in the ICU. Patients received preoxygenation by HFNC or SMO during RSI. HFNC was maintained throughout the intubation procedure whereas SMO was removed to perform laryngoscopy. The primary outcome was the lowest pulse oximetry (SpO(2)) throughout the intubation procedure. Secondary outcomes included drop in SpO(2), adverse events related to intubation, and outcome in the ICU.ResultsA total of 192 patients were randomized. In the intent-to-treat analysis, 184 patients (HFNC n=95; SMO n=89), the median [IQR] lowest SpO(2) was 100% [97; 100] for HFNC and 99% [95; 100] for the SMO group (P=0.30). Mild desaturation below 95% was more frequent with SMO (23%) than with HFNC (12%) (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.26-0.99, P=0.045). There were fewer adverse events in the HFNC group (6%) than in the SMO group (19%) (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.13-0.76, P=0.007), including fewer severe adverse events, respectively 6 (6%) and 14 (16%) with HFNC and SMO (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.15-0.95, P=0.03). ConclusionsCompared with SMO, preoxygenation with HFNC in the ICU did not improve the lowest SpO(2) during intubation in the non-severely hypoxemic patients but led to a reduction in intubation-related adverse events.Trial registrationClinical trial Submission: 7 March 2016. Registry name: Benefits of high-flow nasal cannulae oxygen for preoxygenation during intubation in non-severely hypoxemic patients: the PROTRACH study. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02700321. Eudra CT: 2015-A00145-44. CPP: 15/13-975 (Comite de protection des personnes de Rennes). URL registry: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT02700321.
机译:具有鼻腔插管(HFNC)的高流量疗法的目的预氧化现在在重症监护室(ICU)中普遍存在。然而,没有大型随机研究已经评估其在非严重缺氧患者中的相关性。在随机对照试验(PROTRACH研究)中,我们旨在在ICU.M的快速序列插管(RSI)期间在ICU.M的快速序列插管期间与HFNC与标准袋 - 阀掩氮氧合(SMO)进行评估。包括非 - 在ICU中进行需要插管的缺氧患者。患者在RSI期间通过HFNC或SMO接受前氧化。 HFNC在整个插管过程中维持,而Smo被移除以进行喉镜检查。主要结果是在整个插管过程中最低脉搏血氧测定法(SPO(2))。次要结果包括在孢子(2)中,与插管有关的不良事件,并且ICU.Resultsa的结果总共患者随机化。在意图分析中,184名患者(HFNC N = 95; SMO N = 89),中位数[IQR]最低型孢子(2)为100%[97; 100]对于HFNC和99%[95; 100]对于SMO组(P = 0.30)。低于95%的温和去饱和度比HFNC(12%)(RR 0.51,95%CI 0.26-0.99,P = 0.045)更频繁地频繁。 HFNC组(6%)中的不良事件较少(6%),而不是在SMO组(19%)(RR 0.31,95%CI 0.13-0.76,P = 0.007),包括较少的严重不良事件,分别为6(6%)和HFNC和SMO(RR 0.38,95%CI 0.15-0.95,P = 0.03),14(16%)。结论与SMO相比,ICU中的HFNC预氧化并未在非严重低氧患者的插管中提高了在插管期间的最低孢子(2),但导致了与插管相关的不良事件的减少.TIAL签约扫描审判提交:2016年3月7日名称:在非严重缺氧患者的插管期间,高流量鼻腔插管氧气的高流动鼻腔套管氧气:PROTRACH研究。 ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02700321。 EUDRA CT:2015-A00145-44。 CPP:15 / 13-975(Comite De Presence des Persalnes de Rennes)。 URL注册表:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/nct02700321。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号