首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation >Long-term impact of strength training on muscle strength characteristics in older adults
【24h】

Long-term impact of strength training on muscle strength characteristics in older adults

机译:力量训练力量训练对老年成人肌肉力量特征的长期影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the long-term preventive impact of strength training on muscle performance in older adults. Design: A 7-year follow-up on a 1-year randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of combined resistance training and aerobic training and whole-body vibration training on muscle performance. Setting: University training center. Participants: Men and women (N=83; control [CON] group, n=27; strength-training intervention [INT] group, n=56) between 60 and 80 years of age. Interventions: The INT group exercised 3 times weekly during 1 year, performing a combined resistance training and aerobic training program or a whole-body vibration training program. The former training program was designed according to American College of Sports Medicine guidelines. The whole-body vibration training program included unloaded static and dynamic leg exercises on a vibration platform. The CON group did not participate in any training program. Main Outcome Measures: Static strength (STAT), dynamic strength at 60 /s (DYN60) and at 240 /s (DYN 240), speed of movement at 20% (S20). Results: From baseline to postintervention, muscle performance did not change in the CON group, except for S20 (+6.55%±2.88%, P.001). One year of strength training increased (P≤.001) STAT (+11.46%±1.86%), DYN 60 (+6.96%±1.65%), DYN240 (+9.25%±1.68%), and S20 (+7.73%±2.19%) in the INT group. Between baseline and follow-up, muscle performance decreased (P.001) in both groups. However, STAT and DYN60 showed a significantly lower loss in the INT group (-8.65%±2.35% and -7.10%±2.38%, respectively) compared with the CON group (-16.47%±2.69% and -15.08%±2.27%, respectively). This positive impact might be due to the preservation of the training-induced gains, given the similar annual decline rates in both groups from postintervention to follow-up. Additionally, in trained participants, aging seems to impact velocity-dependent strength and power more compared with basic strength, as the total losses in DYN240 (CON, -15.93%±2.64%; INT, -11.39%±1.95%) and S20 (CON, -14.39%±2.10%; INT, -13.16%±1.72%) did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusions: A 1-year strength-training intervention results in an improved muscle performance in older adults 7 years after their enrollment in the intervention. However, an extensive exercise program cannot attenuate the age-related decline once the intervention stops.
机译:目的:评价力量训练对老年人肌肉表现的长期预防影响。设计:1年随机对照试验的7年随访,比较抗性训练和有氧训练的影响以及全身振动训练对肌肉性能的影响。环境:大学培训中心。参与者:男女(n = 83;控制[CON]组,N = 27;强度训练干预[INT]组,N = 56)在60至80岁之间。干预措施:在1年期间每周行使3次,进行抵抗培训和有氧培训计划或全身振动训练计划。前培训计划是根据美国体育医学指南的课程设计的。全身振动训练计划包括在振动平台上卸载静态和动态腿部练习。 CON集团没有参加任何培训计划。主要观察指标:静力强度(统计),60 / s(DYN60)和240 / s(DYN 240)的动态强度,运动速度为20%(S20)。结果:从基线到后立即,肌肉性能在CON组中没有变化,除了S20(+ 6.55%±2.88%,P& .001)。一年的力量训练增加(p≤001)统计(+ 11.46%±1.86%),DYN240(+ 9.25%±1.65%),DYN240(+ 9.25%±1.68%)和S20(+ 7.73%± 2.19%)在int组中。在基线和随访之间,两组中的肌肉性能降低(P& .001)。然而,与CON组相比,统计和DYN60在烯基(-8.65%±2.35%和-7.10%±2.35%和-7.10%±2.38%)下降(-16.47%±2.69%和-15.08%±2.27% , 分别)。由于两组初期延迟到后续行动,这一积极影响可能是由于保存培训诱导的收益。此外,在训练有素的参与者中,随着DYN240(CON,-15.93%±2.64%,int,-11.39%±1.95%)和S20,老化似乎会影响速度依赖性强度和力量更加依赖于基本强度和电力。 CON,-14.39%±2.10%; int,组之间的int -13.16%±1.72%在组之间没有显着差异。结论:1年的强度培训干预导致在入学后7年内改善老年人的肌肉表现。但是,一旦干预停止,广泛的运动计划就无法衰减与年龄相关的下降。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号