首页> 外文期刊>Applied cognitive psychology >Are seductive details seductive only when you think they are relevant? An experimental test of the moderating role of perceived relevance
【24h】

Are seductive details seductive only when you think they are relevant? An experimental test of the moderating role of perceived relevance

机译:只有当您认为它们相关时诱人的细节是诱人的? 感知相关性的调节作用的实验测试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We investigated whether seductive details (i.e., interesting but irrelevant adjuncts) are harmful to learning only when students (mistakenly) think that they are relevant. We therefore conducted a study in which participants (N = 86) learned either without seductive details (control condition) or with seductive details-in the latter case with or without being informed about the seductive details' irrelevance. In line with our hypotheses, only participants who were not informed about the irrelevance of seductive details revealed worse learning outcomes than those in the control condition, thereby revealing a seductive details effect. Extraneous cognitive load, but not perceived time pressure, mediated the negative effects of being uninformed about the irrelevance of seductive details on learning outcomes. Taken together, our results suggest that the perceived relevance of seductive details is a boundary condition of the seductive details effect.
机译:我们调查了诱人的细节(即,有趣但不相关的附属物)是否只有在学生(错误地)认为他们是相关的时候才会有害。 因此,我们进行了一项研究,其中参与者(n = 86)没有诱人的细节(控制条件)或诱人的细节 - 在后一种情况下或没有被告知诱人细节的不可忍受的情况。 符合我们的假设,只有没有被告知诱人细节的无关的参与者揭示了比控制条件的更糟糕的学习结果,从而揭示了诱人的细节效应。 外来认知载荷,但未感知时间压力,介导对诱人细节无关的对学习结果的无关的负面影响。 我们的结果表明,诱人细节的感知相关性是诱人细节效应的边界条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号