首页> 外文期刊>Advances in health sciences education: theory and practice >Evidence-based medicine and problem based learning a critical re-evaluation
【24h】

Evidence-based medicine and problem based learning a critical re-evaluation

机译:基于证据的医学与基于问题的学习批判性重新评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has been the subject of controversy since it was introduced in 1992. However, it has yet to be critically examined as an alternative paradigm for medical education, which is how it was proposed. This commentary examines EBM on the terms on which it was originally advanced and within the context that gave rise to it, the problem-based learning (PBL) environment at McMaster University in the 1970s and 80s. The EBM educational prescription is revealed to be aligned with the information processing psychology (IPP) model of learning through acquisition of general problem solving skills that characterized the early McMaster version of PBL. The IPP model has been identified in the literature as discordant with an alternative, constructivist, model that emerged at Maastricht University in the Netherlands over the subsequent period. Strengths and weaknesses of EBM are identified from the standpoint of the underlying cognitive theories. Principles are proposed with which to guide an educationally viable approach to learning and teaching the valuable skills included within the original EBM formula
机译:循证医学(ebm)是自1992年介绍的争议的主题。然而,它尚未批判被视为医学教育的替代范式,这是如何提出的。这项评论审查了EBM原始提前的条款,并在20世纪70年代和80年代在麦克马斯特大学的基于问题的学习(PBL)环境中的范围内。通过获取特征在于麦克马斯特版本的PBL早期McMaster版本的一般问题的信息处理心理学(IPP)模型,揭示了EBM教育处方。 IPP模型已在文献中被确定为不间断的,在随后的时期,在荷兰的Maastricht大学出现的替代,建构主义,模型。从潜在的认知理论的观点来确定EBM的优势和弱点。提出了原则,以指导教育可行的学习和教授原始EBM公式中包含的宝贵技能的方法

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号