首页> 外文期刊>Appetite >Meet meat: An explorative study on meat and cultured meat as seen by Chinese, Ethiopians and Dutch
【24h】

Meet meat: An explorative study on meat and cultured meat as seen by Chinese, Ethiopians and Dutch

机译:遇见肉类:中国,埃塞俄比亚人和荷兰语所见的肉类和培养肉类的探险研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this cross-cultural study we investigated how study participants from China, Ethiopia and the Netherlands operationalize the concept of meat and to what extent cultured meat fits or does not fit into this operationalization. We argue that combining the conceptual approaches symbolic boundaries and theory of social practices helps to better understand the possibly culturally dependent operationalization of the concept meat. Ten visiting graduate students from China, 10 from Ethiopia and 10 native Dutch graduate students completed freelist tasks, a pile sort task, interview and essay task, during a single session. We found that butchered animals are at the center of the concept of meat, although depending on culture not all animals are a source of meat. Symbolic boundaries were restricted or stretched depending on social practices within countries. Ethiopian participants applied strictly defined symbolic boundaries, where Chinese and Dutch participants used more broadly defined symbolic boundaries. Cultured meat was seen as a technology for the future and was positioned across the symbolic boundaries of meat. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在这项跨文化研究中,我们调查了从中国,埃塞俄比亚和荷兰的学习参与者如何运作肉类的概念以及培养的肉类拟合或不适合这一运营的程度。我们认为,结合概念方法象征性边界和社会实践理论有助于更好地了解概念肉类的可能文化依赖的运作。来自中国的十名访问研究生,10来自埃塞俄比亚和10名原住民荷兰研究生完成了自由主义任务,一系列会议期间的自由主义任务,采访和论文任务。我们发现屠宰的动物位于肉类概念的中心,虽然取决于文化并非所有动物都是肉的来源。根据国家内部的社会实践限制或延伸象征性边界。埃塞俄比亚参与者应用严格定义的象征边界,其中汉语和荷兰参与者使用更广泛定义的象征性边界。培养的肉被视为未来的技术,并定位在肉类的象征性边界上。 (c)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号