首页> 外文期刊>Annals of anatomy =: Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft >The Terminologia Histologica after 10years: Inconsistencies, mistakes, and new proposals
【24h】

The Terminologia Histologica after 10years: Inconsistencies, mistakes, and new proposals

机译:10年后的术语组织学术:不一致,错误和新的提案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This article details our experience with the Terminologia Histologica (TH) and its utility in the teaching of histology, cytology, and clinical medicine (e.g., pathology and hematology). Latin histological nomenclature has been used for 43years, and the latest version of the TH has been in use for 15years (although it was only issued publicly within the past 10years). The following findings and ensuing proposals allow us to discuss key points pertaining to the TH and make important suggestions for potential changes to the TH (such as the exclusion and inclusion of various terms). We classify these changes into six groups: 1.) mistakes in the TH, 2.) discrepancies among various Terminologiae, 3.) discrepancies within the TH, 4.) the repetition of terms, 5.) synonyms in the TH, and 6.) missing terms in the TH. Surprisingly, unlike the anatomical nomenclature, the histological nomenclature has been neglected in the literature. This article addresses this problem by reviewing and summarizing the state of this field, pointing out key discrepancies, offering solutions, and highlighting topics for further discussion.
机译:本文详细介绍了我们在组织学,细胞学和临床医学教学中的术语组织学(TH)及其效用的经验,以及临床医学(例如病理学和血液学)。拉丁组织学法命名为43年,最新版本已经用于15年(尽管它仅在过去的10年内公开发行)。以下调查结果和随后的建议允许我们讨论与TH相关的关键点,并对TH的潜在变更提出重要建议(例如排除和包含各种术语)。我们将这些变化分为六组:1。)TH中的错误,2.)各个末端的差异,3.)第四,4中的差异。)术语差异,5。 。)缺少TH的术语。令人惊讶的是,与解剖学术语不同,在文献中忽略了组织学法定。本文通过审查和总结此字段的状态,指出关键差异,提供解决方案,并突出主题以进行进一步讨论来解决此问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号