...
首页> 外文期刊>Aggressive behavior: A multidisciplinary journal devoted to the experimental and observational analysis of conflict in humans and animals >Social relations and presence of others predict bystander intervention: Evidence from violent incidents captured on CCTV
【24h】

Social relations and presence of others predict bystander intervention: Evidence from violent incidents captured on CCTV

机译:社会关系和他人的存在预测旁观者干预:来自闭路电视的暴力事件的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Are individuals willing to intervene in public violence? Half a century of research on the "bystander effect" suggests that the more bystanders present at an emergency, the less likely each of them is to provide help. However, recent meta-analytical evidence questions whether this effect generalizes to violent emergencies. Besides the number of bystanders present, an alternative line of research suggests that pre-existing social relations between bystanders and conflict participants are important for explaining whether bystanders provide help. The current paper offers a rare comparison of both factors-social relations and the number of bystanders present-as predictors of bystander intervention in real-life violent emergencies. We systematically observed the behavior of 764 bystanders across 81 violent incidents recorded by surveillance cameras in Copenhagen, Denmark. Bystanders were sampled with a case-control design, their behavior was observed and coded, and the probability of intervention was estimated with multilevel regression analyses. The results confirm our predicted association between social relations and intervention. However, rather than the expected reversed bystander effect, we found a classical bystander effect, as bystanders were less likely to intervene with increasing bystander presence. The effect of social relations on intervention was larger in magnitude than the effect of the number of bystanders. We assess these findings in light of recent discussions about the influence of group size and social relations in human helping. Further, we discuss the utility of video data for the assessment of real-life bystander behavior.
机译:个人愿意介入公共暴力吗?半个世纪的“旁观者效应”的研究表明,紧急情况下的旁观者越多,他们每个人的可能性就越不少。但是,最近的META分析证据有问题,但这种效果是否推广到暴力紧急情况。除了存在的旁观者数量外,还有一种替代研究曲线表明,旁观者和冲突参与者之间的现有社会关系对于解释旁观者是否提供帮助。目前的论文提供了对社会关系的罕见比较 - 社会关系和旁观者的数量存在 - 作为现实生活暴力紧急情况的旁观者干预的预测因素。我们系统地观察到丹麦哥本哈根监控摄像机记录的81名暴力事件中的764个旁观者的行为。通过案例控制设计采样旁观者,观察到并编码其行为,并用多级回归分析估计干预的概率。结果证实了社会关系与干预之间的预测协会。然而,而不是预期的逆转旁观者效应,我们发现经典的旁观者效应,因为旁观者不太可能与增加的旁观者存在进行干预。社会关系对干预的影响幅度大于旁观者数量的效果。我们根据近期讨论人类帮助中的集团规模和社会关系的影响,评估这些发现。此外,我们讨论了视频数据的效用,以评估现实生活旁观者行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号