首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Wiley-Blackwell Online Open >Social relations and presence of others predict bystander intervention: Evidence from violent incidents captured on CCTV
【2h】

Social relations and presence of others predict bystander intervention: Evidence from violent incidents captured on CCTV

机译:社会关系和其他人的存在预示着旁观者的干预:来自央视捕获的暴力事件的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Are individuals willing to intervene in public violence? Half a century of research on the “bystander effect” suggests that the more bystanders present at an emergency, the less likely each of them is to provide help. However, recent meta‐analytical evidence questions whether this effect generalizes to violent emergencies. Besides the number of bystanders present, an alternative line of research suggests that pre‐existing social relations between bystanders and conflict participants are important for explaining whether bystanders provide help. The current paper offers a rare comparison of both factors—social relations and the number of bystanders present—as predictors of bystander intervention in real‐life violent emergencies. We systematically observed the behavior of 764 bystanders across 81 violent incidents recorded by surveillance cameras in Copenhagen, Denmark. Bystanders were sampled with a case–control design, their behavior was observed and coded, and the probability of intervention was estimated with multilevel regression analyses. The results confirm our predicted association between social relations and intervention. However, rather than the expected reversed bystander effect, we found a classical bystander effect, as bystanders were less likely to intervene with increasing bystander presence. The effect of social relations on intervention was larger in magnitude than the effect of the number of bystanders. We assess these findings in light of recent discussions about the influence of group size and social relations in human helping. Further, we discuss the utility of video data for the assessment of real‐life bystander behavior.
机译:个人是否愿意干预公共暴力?半个世纪以来,有关“旁观者效应”的研究表明,在紧急情况下出现的旁观者越多,他们每个人提供帮助的可能性就越小。但是,最近的荟萃分析证据质疑这种影响是否普遍适用于暴力紧急情况。除了存在的旁观者数量之外,另一种研究表明,旁观者和冲突参与者之间的现有社会关系对于解释旁观者是否提供帮助很重要。当前的论文对社会因素和存在的旁观者人数这两个因素进行了罕见的比较,它们是现实生活中紧急情况下旁观者干预的预测指标。我们通过监视摄像机在丹麦哥本哈根记录的81起暴力事件中,系统地观察了764名旁观者的行为。通过病例对照设计对旁观者进行抽样,观察并编码其行为,并通过多级回归分析来估计干预的可能性。结果证实了我们预测的社会关系与干预之间的关联。但是,我们发现经典的旁观者效应而不是预期的逆向旁观者效应,因为旁观者不太可能随着旁观者的出现而进行干预。社会关系对干预的影响在规模上大于旁观者人数的影响。我们根据有关小组规模和社会关系对人类帮助的影响的最新讨论来评估这些发现。此外,我们讨论了视频数据用于评估现实生活中的旁观者行为的实用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号