首页> 外文期刊>American journal of therapeutics >Insulin Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes
【24h】

Insulin Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes

机译:胰岛素治疗2型糖尿病

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Since the discovery of insulin, it was the only drug available for the treatment of diabetes until the development of sulfonylureas and biguanides 50 years later. But even with the availability of oral glucose-lowering drugs, insulin supplementation was often needed to achieve good glucose control in type 2 diabetes. Insulin NPH became the basal insulin therapy of choice and adding NPH to metformin and/or sulfonylureas became the standard of care until basal insulin analogs were developed and new glucose-lowering drugs became available. Areas of Uncertainty: The advantages in cost-benefit of insulin analogs and their combination with new glucose-lowering drugs are still a matter of debate. There is no general agreement on how to avoid inertia by prescribing insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes when really needed, as reflected by the diversity of recommendations in the current clinical practice guidelines. Data Sources: When necessary for this review, a systematic search of the evidence was done in PubMed and Cochrane databases. Therapeutic Advances: Adding new oral glucose-lowering drugs to insulin such as DPP-4 inhibitors lead to a modest HbA1c reduction without weight gain and no increase in hypoglycemia. When SGLT-2 inhibitors are added instead, there is a slightly higher HbA1c reduction, but with body weight and blood pressure reduction. The downside is the increase in genital tract infections. GLP-1 receptor agonists have become the best alternative when basal insulin fails, particularly using fixed ratio combinations. Rapid-acting insulins via the inhaled route may also become an alternative for insulin supplementation and/or intensification. "Smart insulins" are under investigation and may become available for clinical use in the near future. Conclusions: Aggressive weight loss strategies together with the new glucose-lowering drugs which do not cause hypoglycemia nor weight gain should limit the number of patients with type 2 diabetes needing insulin. Nevertheless, because of therapeutic inertia and the progressive nature of the disease, many need at least a basal insulin supplementation and insulin analogs are the best choice as they become more affordable. Fixed ratio combinations with GLP1 receptor agonists are a good choice for intensification of insulin therapy.
机译:背景:自胰岛素发现以来,它是唯一可用于治疗糖尿病的药物,直至50年后的磺酰脲类和双胍类的发育。但即使在口服葡萄糖降低药物的可用性,通常需要胰岛素补充,以在2型糖尿病中实现良好的葡萄糖对照。胰岛素NPH成为选择的基础胰岛素治疗,并向二甲双胍添加NPH和/或磺脲类成为护理标准,直到开发基底胰岛素类似物,并且可获得新的葡萄糖的降低药物。不确定性领域:胰岛素类似物的成本效益的优势及其与新葡萄糖降低药物的组合仍然是辩论问题。由于目前临床实践指南中的建议多样性反映,如何通过在真正需要的情况下确定2型糖尿病患者的胰岛素治疗,没有关于如何避免惯性的一般协议。数据源:必要时,在PubMed和Cochrane数据库中进行了对证据的系统搜索。治疗性进展:将新的口服葡萄糖降至降低药物,例如DPP-4抑制剂,导致不含体重增加和低血糖的增加的HBA1C减少。当添加SGLT-2抑制剂时,减少了稍高的HBA1C,但体重和血压降低。缺点是生殖器感染的增加。当基底胰岛素失败时,GLP-1受体激动剂已成为最佳替代品,特别是使用固定比率组合。通过吸入途径的快速作用胰岛素也可能成为胰岛素补充和/或增强的替代方案。 “智能胰岛素”正在调查中,可能在不久的将来可用于临床使用。结论:侵略性减肥策略与新的葡萄糖降低药物,不会引起低血糖,不重量增益,应限制需要胰岛素的2型糖尿病患者的数量。然而,由于治疗惯性和疾病的渐进性,许多需要至少需要基础胰岛素补充剂和胰岛素类似物是最佳选择,因为它们变得更加实惠。固定比率与GLP1受体激动剂的组合是胰岛素治疗的良好选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号