首页> 外文期刊>American journal of health promotion: AJHP >Total Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake Among US Adults Was Lower When Measured Using a 1-Question Versus 4-Question Screener
【24h】

Total Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake Among US Adults Was Lower When Measured Using a 1-Question Versus 4-Question Screener

机译:使用1题与4题筛选的1个问题测量时,美国成年人中的糖加糖饮料摄入量较低

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare the performance of a 1-question survey screener measuring total sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake to a screener measuring SSB types separately using 4 questions. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Web-based 2014 SummerStyles survey. Participants: A total of 4167 US adults (≥18 years). Measures: Frequency of SSB intake measured using a 1-question screener was compared to frequency using a 4-question screener (regular soda, fruit drinks, sports/energy drinks, sweetened coffee/tea). SSB intake (number of time/day) was categorized as 0, >0 to 0 to <1 time/day, and 68.4% versus 18.9% for ≥1 time/day. There was fair agreement for the 3 SSB intake categories (κ: .27) and poor absolute agreement between the 2 continuous measures (Lin’s CCC: 0.31). Conclusion: Daily SSB intake was significantly lower using a 1-question screener versus a 4-question screener. Researchers should assess SSB types separately or consider that daily SSB intake is likely underestimated with 1 question.
机译:目的:比较1 - 问题测量筛选的性能,测量总糖加饮料(SSB)的摄入量分别使用4个问题分别地测量SSB类型的筛选器。设计:横截面。设置:基于Web的2014 umerstyles调查。参与者:共有4167名美国成年人(≥18岁)。措施:使用一个1题筛选测量的SSB进气的频率与使用4质量筛选器(常规苏打水,水果饮料,运动/能量饮料,加糖的咖啡/茶)进行比较。 SSB Intake(时间/天数)被分类为0,> 0至0至<1次/日,68.4%与≥1次/天的18.9%。 3 SSB摄入类别(κ:.27)和2次连续措施之间的绝对协议差(LIN的CCC:0.31),存在公平协议。结论:使用一个1题筛选者与4题筛选的每日SSB摄入量显着降低。研究人员应单独评估SSB类型或考虑每日SSB Intake可能低估了1个问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号