首页> 外文期刊>Addiction biology >Distress intolerance moderation of motivated attention to cannabis and negative stimuli after induced stress among cannabis users: an ERP study
【24h】

Distress intolerance moderation of motivated attention to cannabis and negative stimuli after induced stress among cannabis users: an ERP study

机译:在大麻用户中诱导压力后,遇险不宽松的促进促进刺激和负刺激:ERP研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Prevalence of cannabis use is increasing, but many regular users do not develop cannabis use disorder (CUD); thus, CUD risk identification among current users is vital for targeted intervention development. Existing data suggest that high distress intolerance (DI), an individual difference reflective of the ability to tolerate negative affect, may be linked to CUD, but no studies have tested possible neurophysiological mechanisms. Increased motivated attentional processing of cannabis and negative emotional stimuli as indexed by neurophysiology [i.e. the late positive potential (LPP)], particularly during acute stress, may contribute to CUD among high DI users. Frequent cannabis users with high (n = 61) and low DI (n = 44) viewed cannabis, negative, and matched neutral images during electroencephalography (EEG) recording before and after a laboratory stressor. Cannabis cue-elicited modulation of the 1000- to 3000-milliseconds LPP was larger in high DI users at post-stressor only, although the effect was only robust in the 1000- to 2000-milliseconds window. Further, modulation magnitude in the high DI group covaried with stress-relief craving and some CUD indices in the 400- to 1000-milliseconds and 1000- to 3000-milliseconds windows, respectively. No significant effects of DI on negative stimuli-elicited LPP modulation were found, although inverse associations with some CUD indices were observed. Finally, exploratory analyses revealed some evidence for DI moderation of the relation between subjective stressor reactivity and negative stimuli-elicited LPP modulation such that greater stressor reactivity was associated with blunted versus enhanced modulation in the high and low DI groups, respectively. Negative and cannabis stimuli-elicited LPP modulation appear to index distinct, CUD-relevant neural processes in high DI cannabis users.
机译:大麻使用的普遍性正在增加,但许多常规用户不开发大麻使用障碍(CUD);因此,当前用户之间的CUD风险识别对于有针对性的干预开发至关重要。现有数据表明,高窘迫的不耐受(DI),一种单独的差异反映耐受阴性影响的能力,可能与CUD相关联,但没有研究可能的神经生理机制。随着神经生理学指数的促进大麻和负情绪刺激的激发促进加工增加[即晚期正潜力(LPP)],特别是在急性胁迫期间,可能导致高DI用户中的CUD。在实验室压力源之前和之后,具有高(n = 61)和低DI(n = 44)的频繁大麻用户在脑电图(EEG)记录期间观看了大麻,负数和匹配的中性图像。在后压力源的高DI DI用户中,大麻的Cue-lecited调制LPP在高DI用户中较大,尽管效果仅在1000至2000毫秒窗口中才能稳健。此外,高DI群中的调制幅度分别在400至1000毫秒和1000至3000毫秒的窗口中分别使用应力浮雕诱捕和一些CUD指数。尽管观察到与某些药物指数的反向关联,但发现了DI对阴性刺激引发的LPP调节的显着影响。最后,探索性分析显示了主观应激源反应性和负刺激引发的LPP调制之间的关系的一些证据,使得较大的压力反应性分别与高和低DI组中的增强调节钝化相关。阴性和大麻刺激引发的LPP调制似乎在高DI Cannabis用户中指标不同的CUD相关神经过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号