首页> 外文期刊>Current Psychology >Attitudes towards Ambiguity in Japanese Healthy Volunteers
【24h】

Attitudes towards Ambiguity in Japanese Healthy Volunteers

机译:对日本健康志愿者的模糊性的态度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Multi-dimensional structure of the Attitudes Towards Ambiguity Scale (ATAS: original Japanese version) and its relationship with the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ) were investigated. We administered the ATAS and the Japanese version of the AAQ to 1019 Japanese healthy volunteers (513 females and 506 males; age range 18-78years). Trial of exploratory factor analysis extracted four distinct clusters (Enjoyment; =.83, Anxiety; =.75, Exclusion; =.75, and Noninterference; =.65) from the ATAS item pool, suggestive of diversity in cognitive/ emotional/ behavioral responses to ambiguity. Confirmative factor analysis showed similar goodness in fit indices between the new four-factor model in the present study and the original five-factor model in our previous study (Nishimura 2007). Considering interpretability by using large number of representative samples with general population in the present study, we adopted the four-factor model. The ATAS Anxiety subscale was negatively correlated with the AAQ willingness subscale (r=-.39, p.001), while the ATAS Enjoyment subscale was positively correlated with the AAQ Action subscale (r=.40, p.001). It is thus suggested that one who enjoys ambiguous situations can adopt two distinct attitudes: Excluding ambiguity from active resolution, or not interfering with ambiguity due to good tolerance of this experience, which can lead to positive and flexible commitments in life. In contrast, one who tends to be anxious about ambiguity may be characterized by exclusion-based attitudes due to intolerance of ambiguity, leading to lowered acceptance of their feelings and of the reality of circumstances. Cognitive/emotional attitudes towards ambiguity may affect acceptance of inner experience and active commitment to reality.
机译:调查了对歧义规模的态度的多维结构(ATAS:原始日本版)及其与接受和行动问卷(AAQ)的关系。我们向AAQ和日本版本的AAQ和日本日本健康志愿者(513名女性和506名男性)进行了管理的atas和日本版;年龄范围为18-78年)。探索性因子分析的试验提取了四个不同的集群(享受; = .83,焦虑; = .75,排除; = .75,非干扰; = .65)来自ATAS项目池,暗示了认知/情绪/行为的多样性对歧义的回应。确认因子分析显示了本研究中新型四因素模型与我们以前的研究中的原始五因素模型之间的拟合指数相似的良好良性(Nishimura 2007)。考虑到本研究中使用大量代表样本的可解释性,我们采用了四因素模型。 ATAS焦虑群落与AAQ意愿子级(R = - 。39,P& .001)负相关,而ATAS享受子程度与AAQ Action Subscale(r = .40,p& .001)正相关。因此,它建议享受含糊不清的情况的人可以采用两种明显的态度:不包括来自主动分辨率的歧义,或者由于这种经验的良好容忍而不会干扰歧义,这可能导致生命中积极和灵活的承诺。相比之下,往往迫切有关歧义的人可以通过基于歧义的不耐受性的基于态度来表征,导致对他们的感受和环境的现实进行了接受。对歧视的认知/情绪态度可能影响接受内心经验和积极承诺的现实。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号