...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Cytologica: The Journal of Clinical Cytology and Cytopathology >Diagnostic Accuracy of Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology for Discrimination of Squamous Cell Carcinoma from Adenocarcinoma in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Diagnostic Accuracy of Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology for Discrimination of Squamous Cell Carcinoma from Adenocarcinoma in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:非小细胞肺癌腺癌鳞状细胞癌的细小针尖细胞学诊断准确性:系统综述与荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: To determine the accuracy with which morphology alone can distinguish adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. Three data bases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus) were searched for studies on the diagnostic accuracy of subtyping non-small cell lung cancer. Accuracy data was abstracted and synthesized using bivariate mixed effects logistic regression as implemented in the midas package in Stata 14. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Higgins I ~(2). Results: We included 17 studies (2,235 cases). Most studies had a low risk of bias. The pooled diagnostic accuracy for cytological diagnosis of adenocarcinoma resulted in a sensitivity of 63% (48–76%) and specificity of 95% (87–98%). The I ~(2)values were 93 and 88% for sensitivity and specificity, respectively. The pooled diagnostic accuracy for the cytological diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma resulted in a sensitivity of 84% (79–88%) and a specificity of 90% (84–94%). The I ~(2)values were 69 and 86% for sensitivity and specificity, respectively. Conclusion: Accuracy varies widely by study and summary estimates do not provide a useful representation of accuracy. Squamous cell carcinoma was diagnosed more accurately than adenocarcinoma.
机译:目的:确定单独的形态学的准确性可以区分非小细胞肺癌中的腺癌和鳞状细胞癌。方法:我们进行了系统审查和荟萃分析。搜索了三个数据库(Medline,Embase,Scopus),以寻求亚型非小细胞肺癌诊断准确性的研究。通过在Stata 14中的Midas包中实施的双抗体混合效应逻辑回归抽象和合成了精度数据。使用HIGGINS I〜(2)评估异质性。结果:我们包括17项研究(2,235例)。大多数研究具有较低的偏见风险。腺癌细胞学诊断的汇集诊断准确性导致敏感性为63%(48-76%),特异性为95%(87-98%)。敏感性和特异性分别为93和88%的I〜(2)值。用于鳞状细胞癌的细胞学诊断的汇集诊断准确性导致敏感性为84%(79-88%),特异性为90%(84-94%)。敏感性和特异性分别为69和86%,I〜(2)值分别为69%和86%。结论:准确性通过研究和摘要估计不差异,不提供准确性的有用表示。比腺癌更准确地诊断鳞状细胞癌。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号