首页> 外文期刊>Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges >The History of Medical Education in Europe and the United States, With Respect to Time and Proficiency
【24h】

The History of Medical Education in Europe and the United States, With Respect to Time and Proficiency

机译:欧洲和美国的医学教育史相和熟练程度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this article, the authors present a historic overview of the development of medical education in the United States and Europe (in particular the Netherlands), as it relates to the issues of time (duration of the course) and proficiency (performance requirements and examinations). This overview is necessarily limited and based largely on post hoc interpretation, as historic data on time frames are not well documented and the issue of competence has only recently been addressed. During times when there were few, if any, formal regulations, physicians were primarily learned gentlemen in command of few effective practical skills, and the duration of education and the competencies acquired by the end of a course simply did not appear to be issues of any interest to universities or state authorities. Though uniform criteria gradually developed for undergraduate medical education, postgraduate specialty training remained, before accreditation organizations set regulations, at the discretion of individual institutions and medical societies. This resulted in large variability in training time and acquired competencies between residency programs, which were often judged on the basis of opaque or questionable criteria. Considering the high costs of health care today and the increasing demand for patient safety and educational efficiency, continuing historic models of nonstandardized practices will no longer be feasible. Efforts to constrain, restructure, and individualize training time and licensing tracks to optimize training for safe care, both in the United States and Europe, are needed.
机译:在本文中,作者呈现了美国和欧洲(特别是荷兰)的医学教育发展的历史概述,因为它涉及时间(课程持续时间)和熟练程度(绩效要求和考试) )。该概述必然有限,主要是基于后HOC解释,因为关于时间框架的历史数据没有充分记录,并且才能最近已经解决了能力问题。在次数期间,如果有的话,如果有的话,正式的法规,医师主要学习绅士,并指挥少数有效的实践技能,以及教育持续时间和课程结束时的能力似乎并未出现任何问题对大学或国家当局的兴趣。虽然为本科医学教育逐步开发统一标准,但在认证组织设定规则之前,仍然是个人机构和医学社会的研究生专业培训。这导致培训时间的巨大可变性,并在居住计划之间获得的能力,通常根据不透明或可疑标准判断。考虑到今天的医疗保健的高成本以及对患者安全和教育效率的日益增长的需求,持续的非标准惯例的历史模式将不再可行。需要努力约束,重组和个性化培训时间和许可轨道,以优化美国和欧洲的安全保健培训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号