Heterogeneity in Definitions of Efficacy and Safety Endpoints?for?Clinical Trials of Crohn’s Disease: A?Systematic?Review

摘要

Background & AimsEndpoints in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Crohn’s disease (CD) are changing. We performed a systematic review of efficacy and safety outcomes reported in placebo-controlled RCTs of patients with CD. MethodsWe searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library through March 1, 2017 for?placebo-controlled RCTs of adult patients with CD treated with aminosalicylates, immunomodulators, corticosteroids, biologics, and oral small molecules. Efficacy and safety outcomes, definitions, and measurement tools were collected and stratified by decade of publication. ResultsOur final analysis included 116 RCTs (81 induction, 44 maintenance, 7 postoperative prevention trials, comprising 27,263 patients). Clinical efficacy endpoints were reported in all trials; the most common endpoint was CD activity index score. We identified 38 unique definitions of clinical response or remission and 32 definitions of loss of response. Definitions of endoscopic response, remission, and endoscopic healing were also heterogeneous, evaluated using the CD endoscopic index of severity, the simple endoscopic score for CD, ulcer resolution, and Rutgeerts’ Score for postoperative endoscopic appearance. Histologic outcomes were reported in 11.1% of induction trials, 2.3% of maintenance trials, and 14.3% of postoperative prevention trials. Biomarker outcomes were reported in 81.5% induction trials, 68.2% of maintenance trials, and 42.9% of postoperative prevention trials. Safety outcomes were reported in 93.8% of induction trials, 97.7% of maintenance trials, and 85.7% of postoperative prevention trials. ConclusionsIn this systematic review, we demonstrate heterogeneity in definitions of response and?remission, and changes in outcomes reported in RCTs of CD. It is a priority to select a?core set of outcomes to standardize efficacy and safety evaluation in trials of patients with?CD.