首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America >Classification of Local Seismic Events in the Utah Region: A Comparison of Amplitude Ratio Methods with a Spectrogram-Based Machine Learning Approach
【24h】

Classification of Local Seismic Events in the Utah Region: A Comparison of Amplitude Ratio Methods with a Spectrogram-Based Machine Learning Approach

机译:犹他州地区局部地震事件的分类:基于谱图的机器学习方法的幅度比例的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The capability to discriminate low-magnitude earthquakes from low-yield anthropogenic sources, both detectable only at local distances, is of increasing interest to the event monitoring community. We used a dataset of seismic events in Utah recorded during a 14-day period (1-14 January 2011) by the University of Utah Seismic Stations network to perform a comparative study of event classification at local scale using amplitude ratio (AR) methods and a machine learning (ML) approach. The event catalog consists of 7377 events with magnitudes M-c ranging from -2 and lower up to 5.8. Events were subdivided into six populations based on location and source type: tectonic earthquakes (TEs), mining-induced events (MIEs), and mining blasts from four known mines (WMB, SMB, LMB, and CQB). The AR approach jointly exploits Pg-to-Sg phase ARs and Rg-to-Sg spectral ARs in multivariate quadratic discriminant functions and was able to classify 370 events with high signal quality from the three groups with sufficient size (TE, MIE, and SMB). For that subset of the events, the method achieved success rates between about 80% and 90%. The ML approach used trained convolutional neural network (CNN) models to classify the populations. The CNN approach was able to classify the subset of events with accuracies between about 91% and 98%. Because the neural network approach does not have a minimum signal quality requirement, we applied it to the entire event catalog, including the abundant extremely low-magnitude events, and achieved accuracies of about 94%-100%. We compare the AR and ML methodologies using a broad set of criteria and conclude that a major advantage to ML methods is their robustness to low signal-to-noise ratio data, allowing them to classify significantly smaller events.
机译:在局部距离处可检测到的低产量人为源来区分低幅度地震的能力是对事件监测界的兴趣越来越兴趣。我们在犹他大学(2011年1月1日1月1日)的犹他州(2011年1月1日1月1日),在犹他大学地震站网络中使用了一个地震事件的数据集,以利用幅度比(AR)方法在局部规模上对事件分类进行比较研究机器学习(ML)方法。该事件目录由7377个事件组成,具有从-2的大小m-c的事件组成,低至5.8。事件被细分为基于位置和源类型的六个群体:构造地震(TES),采矿诱导的事件(MIES),以及来自四个已知矿山的挖掘(WMB,SMB,LMB和CQB)。 AR方法在多变量二次判别函数中共同利用PG-to-SG相ARS和RG-To-SG光谱ARS,并且能够将370个具有高信号质量的事件与具有足够大小(TE,MIE和SMB的三组)。对于该事件的那个子集,该方法达到了约80%和90%的成功率。 ML方法使用训练有素的卷积神经网络(CNN)模型来分类群体。 CNN方法能够将事件的子集分类为约91%和98%的准确度。由于神经网络方法没有最小的信号质量要求,所以我们将其应用于整个事件目录,包括丰富的极低幅度事件,并实现了约94%-100%的精度。我们使用广泛的标准进行比较AR和ML方法,并得出结论,ML方法的主要优点是它们对低信噪比数据的鲁棒性,允许它们对其进行显着较小的事件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号