首页> 外文学位 >Application of Engineering Principles with a Comparison of Machine Learning Classification Methods to Predict Treatment Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.
【24h】

Application of Engineering Principles with a Comparison of Machine Learning Classification Methods to Predict Treatment Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

机译:工程原理与机器学习分类方法的比较在预测头颈癌患者治疗结果中的应用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Our research approach emphasized a comparison of various classification methods ("Decision Trees, Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machines") and compared those with ensemble classifier models ("bagging" and "boosting") to predict weight loss of five or more kilograms and toxicity of five or more grays above the actual radiation therapy dose received by patients, with data up to 90 days post-treatment. The data for this study was obtained from Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, taking anonymous data sets from OncospaceRTM database, consisting of randomly selected records of 326 patient instances (rows) and 295 features or predictor variables (columns) out of 729 features available, to predict weight loss. Features included tumor factors, diagnosis, treatment, patients' anonymous biographical data, cancer site, and quality of life surveys ( Appendix A), among others. Toxicity data included 597 patient instances (rows) and 37 predictor variables (columns), including toxicity to various organs and tissue. OncospaceRTM data used was from previously treated patients collected from June 24, 2014, back to January 1, 2006 (sample data fields in Appendix B). Feature variables and models were validated, evaluating predictive performance accuracy with 10-fold cross-validation and expert feature selection (domain knowledge and tools). We built the models using a comprehensive training and testing process available with MathWorksRTM, MatlabRTM, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox(TM), Classification Learner Application. Ensemble bagged trees classifiers showed prediction accuracies of 86.1% (toxicity) and 96.3% (weight loss). Ensemble boosted trees showed 92.3% (toxicity) and 100.0% (weight loss). Ensemble methods showed consistently higher prediction accuracies than that of single classifiers.
机译:我们的研究方法着重比较各种分类方法(“决策树,逻辑回归,朴素贝叶斯,线性判别分析,最近邻,支持向量机”),并将它们与集成分类器模型(“装袋”和“提升”)进行比较。预测治疗后90天之内的数据,可以预测患者体重减轻5公斤或以上,而毒性高于患者实际放射治疗剂量的5处或以上。该研究的数据来自马里兰州巴尔的摩的约翰霍普金斯医院,从OncospaceRTM数据库中获取匿名数据集,该数据集由729个可用特征中的326个患者实例(行)和295个特征或预测变量(列)的随机选择记录组成,以预测体重减轻。功能包括肿瘤因素,诊断,治疗,患者的匿名传记数据,癌症部位和生活质量调查(附录A)等。毒性数据包括597个患者实例(行)和37个预测变量(列),包括对各种器官和组织的毒性。使用的OncospaceRTM数据来自2014年6月24日至2006年1月1日收集的先前接受治疗的患者(附录B中的示例数据字段)。对特征变量和模型进行了验证,并通过10倍交叉验证和专家特征选择(领域知识和工具)评估了预测性能的准确性。我们使用MathWorksRTM,MatlabRTM,统计和机器学习工具箱(TM),分类学习器应用程序提供的全面培训和测试过程来构建模型。整体袋装树木分类器的预测准确度为86.1%(毒性)和96.3%(体重减轻)。整体增强树显示92.3%(毒性)和100.0%(重量减轻)。集成方法显示的预测准确性始终高于单个分类器。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hernandez, Alberto Miranda.;

  • 作者单位

    The George Washington University.;

  • 授予单位 The George Washington University.;
  • 学科 Biomedical engineering.;Systems science.;Management.
  • 学位 D.Engr.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 130 p.
  • 总页数 130
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:48:26

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号