...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Cytologica: The Journal of Clinical Cytology and Cytopathology >Value of fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of breast lesions
【24h】

Value of fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of breast lesions

机译:细针穿刺对乳腺病变的诊断价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy values of 276 fine needle aspriations (FNA) of breast lesions with a subsequent excisional biopsy diagnosis and to make a comparison between 25 studies of the literature using the same criteria to calculate those values. STUDY DESIGN: Cytologic findings were compared with the histologic diagnosis of each mass. The correlation Of results was analyzed by a decision-analysis approach, and the following values concerning diagnostic accuracy were calculated in the present study and in 25 other reports: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, false positive fraction and false negative fraction. To calculate those values, we eliminated unsatisfactory results and assumed that suspicious and positive cytologic findings represented carcinoma of the breast. RESULTS: Comparing our results with the means in the literature (numbers in parenthesis), FNA detected cancer with a sensitivity of 92.1% (87.7%), specificity of 98.6% (94.7%), positive predictive value of 99.4% (92.8%), negative predictive value of 82.1% (90.7%), false positive fraction of 0.6% (7.1%) and false negative fraction of 17.9% (13.4%); in 6.2% of cases the material was unsatisfactory (13.4%). CONCLUSION All the rates varied enormously between the studies and during the past 13 years. It seems that false positive and false negative fractions tended to diminish and stabilize in more recent years, and specificity and sensitivity underwent a slight increase. The differences between the rates of those studies suggest that FNA of the breast has some unavoidable limitations. [References: 45]
机译:目的:评估276例乳腺病变的细针穿刺活检(FNA)的准确性值,然后进行切除活检诊断,并使用相同的标准对25项文献研究进行比较,以计算这些值。研究设计:将细胞学检查结果与每个肿块的组织学诊断结果进行比较。结果的相关性通过决策分析方法进行了分析,并且在本研究和其他25个报告中计算出以下与诊断准确性有关的值:敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值,阴性预测值,假阳性分数和假阴性分数。为了计算这些值,我们消除了令人满意的结果,并假设可疑和阳性细胞学检查结果代表了乳腺癌。结果:将我们的结果与文献中的方法(带括号的数字)进行比较,FNA检测出的癌症敏感性为92.1%(87.7%),特异性为98.6%(94.7%),阳性预测值为99.4%(92.8%) ,阴性预测值为82.1%(90.7%),假阳性率为0.6%(7.1%)和假阴性率为17.9%(13.4%);在6.2%的情况下,材料不合格(13.4%)。结论在研究之间以及过去的13年中,所有比率均存在巨大差异。假阳性和假阴性分数似乎在最近几年趋于减少和稳定,并且特异性和敏感性略有增加。这些研究的比率之间的差异表明,乳房的FNA具有不可避免的局限性。 [参考:45]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号