首页> 外文期刊>Academic pediatrics >A novel self-evaluation tool to assess the team function of a child protection team
【24h】

A novel self-evaluation tool to assess the team function of a child protection team

机译:一种新颖的自我评估工具,用于评估儿童保护团队的团队职能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: The aim of this study was to develop a reliable and valid self-evaluation tool for use by child protection team (CPT) members. Methods: An online survey was administered to members of 10 CPTs. The survey included the following 3 sections: 1) initial conditions (eg, team composition, resources), 2) enabling conditions (eg, team effort, strategy), and 3) team effectiveness (eg, team cohesion, meeting performance standards). Each section contained multiple subscales. Internal consistency was calculated using Cronbach α. To evaluate construct validity, the subscale scores of the most advanced teams who qualified as centers of excellence (n = 3) were compared with the subscale scores of the other teams (n = 7) to determine whether the tool could distinguish between the two. Results: Of 116 team members, 83 (72%) completed the survey. The subscales exhibited good internal consistency (α =.71-.97). The 3 centers of excellence had significantly higher mean scores than the other 7 CPTs on the following subscales: incentives (in the initial conditions section, 61.46 vs 38.89; P =.003), effort (in the enabling conditions section, 79.31 vs 67.70; P =.003), and professional growth (in the team effectiveness section, 83.89 vs 80.40; P =.004). Conclusions: This novel survey demonstrates satisfactory test characteristics and can be used to assess CPT performance and identify areas for improvement.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是开发一种可靠且有效的自我评估工具,以供儿童保护小组(CPT)成员使用。方法:对10个CPT成员进行了在线调查。该调查包括以下三个部分:1)初始条件(例如,团队组成,资源),2)授权条件(例如,团队努力,策略)和3)团队有效性(例如,团队凝聚力,符合绩效标准)。每个部分都包含多个分量表。使用Cronbachα计算内部一致性。为了评估构造的有效性,将合格的卓越中心(n = 3)最先进的团队的子量表分数与其他团队的子量表分数(n = 7)进行比较,以确定该工具是否可以区分两者。结果:在116位团队成员中,有83位(72%)完成了调查。分量表显示出良好的内部一致性(α= .71-.97)。在以下子量表上,三个卓越中心的平均得分均显着高于其他七个CPT:激励(在初始条件下,分别为61.46和38.89; P = .003),努力(在允许条件下,分别为79.31和67.70; P = .003)和职业发展(在团队效力部分,为83.89 vs 80.40; P = .004)。结论:这项新颖的调查显示出令人满意的测试特性,可用于评估CPT性能并确定需要改进的地方。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号