...
首页> 外文期刊>癌と化学療法 >Carboplatin plus gemcitabine therapy versus carboplatin plus weekly paclitaxel therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer
【24h】

Carboplatin plus gemcitabine therapy versus carboplatin plus weekly paclitaxel therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

机译:Carboplatin Plus Gemcitabine治疗与Carboplatin加上每周紫杉醇治疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We compared two chemotherapy regimens for advanced non small-cell lung cancer. The CG regimen consisted of carboplatin (AUC 4 to 5) on day 1 plus gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) on day 1 and 8, every three weeks, while the CP regimen was carboplatin (AUC 6) on day 1 plus paclitaxel (70 mg/m(2)) on day 1, 8 and 15, every four weeks. There was a total of 62 patients, 23 on the CG regimen and 39 on the CP regimen. In initial treatment, the response rate, time to progression and median survival time in the CG regimen and CP regimens were 40% vs 22%, 124 days vs 67 days, and 422 days vs 328 days, respectively. There was no statistical difference in the outcome. However, the toxicity profile was different in the two regimens. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were frequent in the CG regimen (61% vs 31%, p=0.02, 44% vs 3%, p=0.0002, respectively). Non hematological toxicity including grade 2 alopecia was less in the CG regimen (4% vs 36%, p=0.012). In choosing the chemotherapeutic regimen for non small cell cancer, it is important to consider the toxicity.
机译:我们比较了晚期非小细胞肺癌两次化疗方案。所述CG方案包括卡铂(AUC 4-5)在第1天+吉西他滨第1天和第8,每三周第1天加(1000毫克/米(2)),而CP方案为卡铂(AUC 6)紫杉醇第1天,第8和15,每四周(70毫克/米(2))。共有62例患者,23对CG方案和39对CP方案了。在初始处理中,响应速率,疾病进展时间和平均存活时间在CG方案和CP方案分别为40%比22%和124天与67天,和422天与328天,分别。有没有在结果没有统计学差异。然而,毒性特征是在两个不同的方案。 3/4级白细胞和血小板减少在CG方案是频繁(61%对31%,p值= 0.02,44%和3%,p值= 0.0002)。非血液学毒性,包括2级脱发少在CG方案(4%对36%,p值= 0.012)。在选择化疗方案对非小细胞肺癌,它要考虑的毒性是非常重要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号