...
首页> 外文期刊>Current pharmaceutical design >Editorial: novel data on the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, treatment targets, and new therapeutic interventions in lipid-related cardiovascular risk factors.
【24h】

Editorial: novel data on the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, treatment targets, and new therapeutic interventions in lipid-related cardiovascular risk factors.

机译:社论:关于动脉粥样硬化发病机理,治疗目标的新数据,以及与脂质相关的心血管危险因素的新治疗手段。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) claims more lives than any other disease in the Western World [1]. In US, it is estimated that there was a decline in CVD-related deaths from 1980 to 2000 [1,2]. Nearly half (44%) of this drop resulted from population-wide risk factor reduction (smoking), whereas another (47%) resulted from medical treatment targeting patients at risk or with established atherosclerosis [1,2]. In contrast, only 5% of the reduction in deaths was estimated to be due to revascularization in patients with established CVD [1,2]. No changes in the dietary intake of fat (total, saturated and polyunsaturated) and cholesterol were recorded from 1988-1994 to 2007-2008 [3]. However, the age-adjusted use of cholesterol-lowering medications increased from 1.6 to 12.5% (P < 0.001) [3]. Data suggest that changes in dietary fat intake had minimal contribution to the observed trend in mean concentrations of total cholesterol, while the increased use of cholesterollowering medications was estimated to account for most of the change [3]. The INTERHEART study showed that 9 CVD risk factors - smoking, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, abdominal obesity, stress, poor diet, physical inactivity, and excess alcohol consumption - are associated with > 90% of the CVD risk [4]. All the above suggest that despite the substantial effort to inform the public on the benefit of modifying reversible CVD risk factors this has no practical effect, because people are not keen to change their lifestyle on a longterm basis. This led the Centers for Disease Control to design the Million Hearts Initiative, an effort aimed to prevent 1 million myocardial infarctions and strokes over the next 5 years [1, 5]. Moreover, this contributed in embracing the concept of ideal CVD health by the American Heart Association (AHA) among its strategic goals for 2020 [6]. This concept was intended to focus on the promotion of a healthy lifestyle and the adoption of a multi-factorial pharmacological intervention, aimed to improve the CV health of all Americans by 20%, in order to reduce deaths from myocardial infarctions and strokes by 20% by 2020 [6]. All the above seem to have played a significant role in the composition of the new ACC/AHA lipid guidelines [7]. As stated by the authors of the guidelines, they focused on statins and only briefly mentioned other hypolipidemic drugs, because only statins have shown a clearly defined clinical benefit [7]. Also, the ACC/AHA guidelines risk assessment was based on an equation that appears to overestimate CVD risks by 75-150%, roughly doubling the actual risk [7-9]. Based on the new ACC/AHA guidelines, it is probable that 40-50% of the 46 million middle-aged Americans targeted for statin treatment by the ACC/AHA guidelines do not actually need these drugs [7,9]. It may have been the aim of the panel to protect the US population from a greater CVD incidence that is a consequence of the ever increasing prevalence of obesity [10]. By 2015, the prevalence of CVD in US will be 38% [10]. Obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and metabolic syndrome (MetS) are driving CVD risks [10]. Despite the fact that 70% of US adults are overweight or obese, diet quality continues to deteriorate, leading to the fact that at present more than half of US adults have significant lipid abnormalities [10]. All the above point to the necessity to further inform physicians about CVD risk factors and update the information on the pathogenesis and the recent (as well as the near future) advances in the treatment of dyslipidemias and atherosclerosis. In this issue of the Journal, several articles consider recent advances in novel and established CVD risk factors, mainly those related to lipids, aiming to prevent or treat fatal or non-fatal CVD. The current and future therapeutic options targeting residual CVD risk have been summarized in a multidisciplinary manner. Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a fai
机译:心血管疾病(CVD)导致的生命死于西方世界中任何其他疾病[1]。在美国,据估计,从1980年到2000年,与CVD相关的死亡人数有所下降[1,2]。这一下降的将近一半(44%)是由于降低了整个人群的危险因素(吸烟),而另一半(47%)是由于针对有风险或患有动脉粥样硬化的患者进行药物治疗所致[1,2]。相比之下,估计只有5%的死亡减少是由于已建立CVD的患者的血运重建所致[1,2]。从1988-1994年到2007-2008年,饮食中的脂肪摄入量(总,饱和和多不饱和)和胆固醇没有变化[3]。然而,降低年龄的胆固醇降低药物的使用从1.6增至12.5%(P <0.001)[3]。数据表明,饮食中脂肪摄入量的变化对总胆固醇平均浓度的趋势变化影响很小,而降低胆固醇的药物的使用增加估计是造成这种变化的主要原因[3]。 INTERHEART研究表明,9种CVD危险因素-吸烟,血脂异常,糖尿病(DM),高血压,腹部肥胖,压力,不良饮食,缺乏运动和过量饮酒-与CVD危险的> 90%有关[4 ]。以上所有这些表明,尽管人们已经做出了很大努力来告知公众改变可逆性CVD危险因素的益处,但这并没有实际效果,因为人们不愿长期改变自己的生活方式。这导致疾病控制中心设计了“百万心脏计划”,该计划旨在在未来5年内预防1百万例心肌梗塞和中风[1,5]。此外,这有助于在其2020年战略目标中采纳美国心脏协会(AHA)的理想CVD健康概念[6]。该概念的重点是促进健康的生活方式和采用多种因素的药理干预措施,旨在将所有美国人的心血管健康提高20%,从而将因心肌梗塞和中风导致的死亡减少20%到2020年[6]。以上所有内容似乎在新的ACC / AHA脂质指南的组成中发挥了重要作用[7]。如指南作者所言,他们只关注他汀类药物,仅简要提及其他降血脂药物,因为只有他汀类药物显示出明确的临床益处[7]。同样,ACC / AHA指南的风险评估基于一个方程,该方程似乎将CVD风险高估了75-150%,大约是实际风险的两倍[7-9]。根据新的ACC / AHA指南,通过ACC / AHA指南靶向他汀类药物治疗的4,600万中年美国人中,有40-50%实际上不需要这些药物[7,9]。肥胖症的患病率不断上升,其结果可能是该小组的目的是保护美国人群免受更大的CVD发病率的影响[10]。到2015年,美国的CVD患病率将达到38%[10]。肥胖,高血压,血脂异常,2型糖尿病(T2DM)和代谢综合征(MetS)是CVD的危险因素[10]。尽管有70%的美国成年人超重或肥胖,但饮食质量仍在继续恶化,导致目前超过一半的美国成年人存在明显的脂质异常[10]。以上所有这些都表明有必要进一步告知医生有关CVD的危险因素,并更新有关血脂异常和动脉粥样硬化的发病机理以及近期(以及不久的将来)进展的信息。在本期《华尔街日报》上,有几篇文章考虑了新的和已确立的CVD危险因素(主要是与脂质有关的危险因素)的最新进展,旨在预防或治疗致命或非致命CVD。以残留的CVD风险为目标的当前和将来的治疗选择已经以多学科的方式进行了总结。家族性高胆固醇血症(FH)是一种疾病

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号