...
首页> 外文期刊>Transplantation: Official Journal of the Transplantation Society >Section 5. Further Expanding the Criteria for HOC in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: When Not to Transplant: SNUH Experienc
【24h】

Section 5. Further Expanding the Criteria for HOC in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: When Not to Transplant: SNUH Experienc

机译:第5节进一步扩大了肝脏肝移植中HOC的标准:当不移植时:SNUH体验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Living donor liver transplant (LDLT) is one of the important modalities to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Asian countries. LDLT for HCC consists of >50% of the total LDLT at Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH). Milan or University of California San Francisco (UCSF) criteria were not considered as absolute selection criteria for LDLT at SNUH. We experienced that some patients with beyond Milan criteria have long-term survival after LDLT. On the contrary, LDLT showed poorer outcome than deceased donor LT (DDLT) in patients with within UCSF criteria in our series. There are several reasons for higher recurrence rate in LDLT such as fast-track selection and rapid regeneration in LDLT. Therefore, the feasibility of conventional criteria based on tumor size and number to predict HCC recurrence after LDLT seemed somewhat different from that of DDLT. We identified significant pre-operative biological factors such as AFP, PIVKAII, and PET positivity. Combination of those biological factors predicted HCC recurrence better than conventional criteria based on size and number. All patients with three risk factors showed 100% recurrence. This group should be excluded regardless of Milan criteria. There have been debates in expanding the criteria in LDLT. Some centers still stick on the expanded criteria that are estimated to yield a 5-year survival of approximately 50%. However, there was no completely tailored criterion to predict HCC recurrence exactly. The survival after recurrence was also different from case by case. Furthermore, the introduction of m-TOR inhibitor and targeted agent improved survival after recurrence. Based on these ideas, we experimentally expanded our indication to the far advanced HCC (HCC larger than 10 cm or more than 10 numbers or with macrovascular invasion preoperatively). The patients with far advanced HCC have usually poor prognosis. However, the selected patients with low AFP (<200 ng/ml), 2-year recurrence free survival was 54.5%.In conclusion, we are now expanding the criteria selectively up to patients with macrovascular invasion if there are no other effective treatment options and the expected survival and risk after LT is acceptable in both recipient and donor. The current absolute contraindication for LDLT in SNUH is extrahepatic metastasis.
机译:活体供体肝移植(LDLT)是在亚洲国家治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)的重要型号之一。 LDLT为HCC组成了首尔国立大学医院(SNUH)的> 50%的LDLT。米兰或加州大学旧金山(UCSF)标准不被视为SNUH时LDLT的绝对选择标准。我们经历了一些超越米兰标准的患者在LDLT之后长期生存。相反,LDLT在我们的系列中的UCSF标准中患者中的死亡捐助者LT(DDLT)显示出较差的结果。 LDLT中具有较高复发率的原因,如LDLT的快速选择和快速再生。因此,基于肿瘤大小和数量的常规标准的可行性预测LDLT之后的HCC复发似乎与DDLT的稍微不同。我们确定了显着的术前生物因素,如AFP,PiVKaii和Pet阳性。这些生物因素的组合比以基于尺寸和数量的传统标准更好地预测HCC复发。所有三种危险因素的患者均可复发100%。无论米兰标准如何,都应排除该组。在扩大LDLT的标准方面存在争论。有些中心仍然坚持估计的扩大标准,估计产生5年的生存率约为50%。但是,没有完全量身定制的标准可以完全预测HCC再次发生。复发后的存活也与逐情况不同。此外,引入M-TOR抑制剂和靶向剂在复发后改善了存活。根据这些想法,我们通过实验扩展到远期高级HCC(大于10厘米或超过10厘米或超过10厘米或超过10厘米或大血管入侵)的指示。高级HCC患者通常预后差。然而,患有低AFP(<200ng / ml)的选定患者,2年复发自由存活率为54.5%。结论,如果没有其他有效的治疗方案,我们现在将在血管侵袭患者中选择性地扩展标准在接收者和捐赠者中可以接受后,预期的存活率和风险。 SNUH中LDLT的目前绝对禁忌症是脱胸部转移。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号