...
首页> 外文期刊>Transplantation: Official Journal of the Transplantation Society >Section 5. Further Expanding the Criteria for HOC in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: When Not to Transplant: SNUH Experienc
【24h】

Section 5. Further Expanding the Criteria for HOC in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: When Not to Transplant: SNUH Experienc

机译:第5节。进一步扩大活体供体肝移植中HOC的标准:何时不移植:SNUH Experienc

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Living donor liver transplant (LDLT) is one of the important modalities to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Asian countries. LDLT for HCC consists of >50% of the total LDLT at Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH). Milan or University of California San Francisco (UCSF) criteria were not considered as absolute selection criteria for LDLT at SNUH. We experienced that some patients with beyond Milan criteria have long-term survival after LDLT. On the contrary, LDLT showed poorer outcome than deceased donor LT (DDLT) in patients with within UCSF criteria in our series. There are several reasons for higher recurrence rate in LDLT such as fast-track selection and rapid regeneration in LDLT. Therefore, the feasibility of conventional criteria based on tumor size and number to predict HCC recurrence after LDLT seemed somewhat different from that of DDLT. We identified significant pre-operative biological factors such as AFP, PIVKAII, and PET positivity. Combination of those biological factors predicted HCC recurrence better than conventional criteria based on size and number. All patients with three risk factors showed 100% recurrence. This group should be excluded regardless of Milan criteria. There have been debates in expanding the criteria in LDLT. Some centers still stick on the expanded criteria that are estimated to yield a 5-year survival of approximately 50%. However, there was no completely tailored criterion to predict HCC recurrence exactly. The survival after recurrence was also different from case by case. Furthermore, the introduction of m-TOR inhibitor and targeted agent improved survival after recurrence. Based on these ideas, we experimentally expanded our indication to the far advanced HCC (HCC larger than 10 cm or more than 10 numbers or with macrovascular invasion preoperatively). The patients with far advanced HCC have usually poor prognosis. However, the selected patients with low AFP (<200 ng/ml), 2-year recurrence free survival was 54.5%.In conclusion, we are now expanding the criteria selectively up to patients with macrovascular invasion if there are no other effective treatment options and the expected survival and risk after LT is acceptable in both recipient and donor. The current absolute contraindication for LDLT in SNUH is extrahepatic metastasis.
机译:在亚洲国家,活体供体肝移植(LDLT)是治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)的重要方式之一。 HCC的LDLT占首尔国立大学医院(SNUH)总LDLT的50%以上。在SNUH上,米兰或加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校(UCSF)的标准不被视为LDLT的绝对选择标准。我们经历了一些超出米兰标准的患者在LDLT后可以长期生存。相反,在我们系列中符合UCSF标准的患者中,LDLT的结果比已故的供者LT(DDLT)差。 LDLT中较高的复发率有多个原因,例如LDLT中的快速通道选择和快速再生。因此,基于肿瘤大小和数量的常规标准预测LDLT后HCC复发的可行性似乎与DDLT有所不同。我们确定了重要的术前生物学因素,例如AFP,PIVKAII和PET阳性。这些生物学因素的组合预测HCC复发优于基于大小和数目的常规标准。具有三种危险因素的所有患者均显示100%复发。无论米兰的标准如何,都应将该组排除在外。在扩大LDLT中的标准方面存在争议。一些中心仍然坚持扩大的标准,据估计其5年生存率约为50%。但是,尚没有完全定制的标准来准确预测HCC复发。复发后的存活率也因个案而异。此外,引入m-TOR抑制剂和靶向药物可提高复发后的生存率。基于这些想法,我们通过实验将适应症扩大到了晚期肝癌(大于10厘米或大于10的肝癌或术前有大血管侵犯的肝癌)。晚期肝癌患者通常预后较差。但是,选择的AFP低(<200 ng / ml),2年无复发生存率的患者为54.5%。总而言之,如果没有其他有效的治疗选择,我们现在将选择标准扩展至有大血管浸润的患者接受者和捐献者均可接受LT的预期生存和风险。目前SNUH中LDLT的绝对禁忌症是肝外转移。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号