...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Authors' reply
【24h】

Authors' reply

机译:作者的回复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Sally Doherty and colleagues report the findings of a retrospective study of surgical mortality in Ireland during the same period studied in our prospective European study (EuSOS).1 Using a different method, the authors collected data describing a larger cohort of patients and identified fewer deaths, resulting in a different mortality estimate. While the authors use the original EuSOS data as a reference for their findings, they also suggest these data are inaccurate. The overall mortality for any large population of surgical patients is crucially dependent on the representation of high-risk surgical patients within it. The lower numbers of critical-care admissions and deaths suggest the high-risk group was not so strongly represented in this repeat study population. This difference might also represent a stronger tendency for investigators to include patients undergoing complex surgery in the prospective study. Nonetheless, the hospital mortality of 2-5% is higherthan previous estimates, which range from 1 to 2%,2 and remains a cause for concern.
机译:Sally Doherty及其同事报告了在我们预期欧洲研究(Eusos)的同一时期内对爱尔兰外科死亡率的回顾性研究的调查结果.1使用不同的方法,作者收集了描述较大的患者队列的数据,并确定了更少的死亡,导致死亡率估计不同。虽然作者使用原始EUSOS数据作为其发现的参考,但他们还建议这些数据不准确。任何大群手术患者的总体死亡率都关键取决于它内部高危手术患者的代表性。较数较少的关键保理和死亡表明,在这一重复研究人口中,高风险群体并不是如此强烈代表。这种差异也可能代表调查人员在前瞻性研究中包括复杂手术的患者的更强烈倾向。尽管如此,2-5%的医院死亡率高度以前的估计数,其范围为1〜2%,2,仍然是令人关切的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号