首页> 外文期刊>Current opinion in cardiology >Towards excellence in revascularization for left main coronary artery disease
【24h】

Towards excellence in revascularization for left main coronary artery disease

机译:争取在左主干冠脉疾病的血运重建方面取得卓越成就

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this article is to review the current revascularization strategies in patients presenting with unprotected left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD). RECENT FINDINGS: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the current standard of treatment for patients with LMCAD. The development and refinement of techniques increased the number of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in LMCAD patients. SUMMARY: Although several observational studies show comparable results of CABG and/or PCI in patients with LMCAD, there is currently no convincing randomized evidence that either one of the two is associated with better long-term survival. Recent meta-analyses of four small randomized trials revealed a similar rate of 1-year major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, higher rates of target vessel revascularization and lower stroke rates for PCI. Pooling randomized patients studies stratified by lesion complexity strengthened the hypothesis that CABG is better in more complex LMCAD patients. However, the randomized comparisons are affected by methodological limitations and lack power to be conclusive. The ongoing Evaluation of XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Stent System Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization (EXCEL) trial is expected to provide a better answer on the optimal treatment strategy for LMCAD patients. In the meantime, risk models need to be improved and the most appropriate revascularization strategy for the individual LMCAD patient should be chosen using a multidisciplinary heart team that considers not only risk models but also other clinical and economic facets.
机译:审查的目的:本文的目的是审查患有未保护的左主冠状动脉疾病(LMCAD)的患者当前的血运重建策略。最新发现:冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)是LMCAD患者的当前治疗标准。技术的发展和完善增加了LMCAD患者的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的数量。简介:尽管几项观察性研究显示,LMCAD患者CABG和/或PCI具有可比的结果,但目前尚无令人信服的随机证据表明二者之一与较好的长期生存有关。最近对四项小型随机试验的荟萃分析显示,一年期重大不良心血管和脑血管事件的发生率相似,靶血管血运重建的发生率更高,PCI的卒中发生率更低。合并病灶复杂性分层的随机患者研究强化了以下假设:CABG在较复杂的LMCAD患者中更好。但是,随机比较受到方法学限制的影响,并且缺乏结论性的能力。正在进行的XIENCE V依维莫司洗脱支架系统与冠状动脉旁路手术对左主血运重建术(EXCEL)有效性的评估正在进行中,有望为LMCAD患者的最佳治疗策略提供更好的答案。同时,需要改进风险模型,并且应该使用多学科的心脏团队为单个LMCAD患者选择最合适的血运重建策略,该团队不仅要考虑风险模型,还要考虑其他临床和经济方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号