...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric blood & cancer >Efficacy and safety of recombinant E. coli E. coli asparaginase in children with previously untreated acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A randomized multicenter study of the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of recombinant E. coli E. coli asparaginase in children with previously untreated acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A randomized multicenter study of the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group

机译:具有先前未处理的急性淋巴细胞白血病儿童重组大肠杆菌大肠杆菌芦笋蛋白酶的疗效和安全性:荷兰儿童肿瘤组的随机多中心研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background The efficacy and safety of recombinant Escherichia coli –asparaginase (rASNase) was compared to native E.coli asparaginase (Asparaginase medac). Methods One hundred and ninety‐nine children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia were randomized to receive one of both agents at a dose of 5,000 U/m2 during induction (eight doses) and 10,000 U/m2 during the postinduction phase (only high‐risk patients; standard‐ and medium‐risk patients received pegaspargase). Results Median trough serum asparaginase activity levels were comparable between both groups; they ranged from 143 to 182?U/l during induction and were above the target value of 100?U/l. Complete asparagine depletion in serum was achieved in 97.9% of patients, with no significant differences between both groups. On day 33 (end of induction), only two (2%) evaluable patients in each group had measurable asparagine serum levels, and complete asparagine depletion in the cerebrospinal fluid was achieved in 98.8% and 93.6% of the patients with rASNase and Asparaginase medac, respectively. During induction, 2.1% and 5% of patients developed an allergic reaction to rASNase or Asparaginase medac, respectively. Approximately 41% of the patients in both groups had a clinical allergy or enzyme inactivation to the first dose of any asparaginase preparation in postinduction. A comparable proportion of patients in both groups developed anti‐asparaginase antibodies (57%) during repeated administration of asparaginase. Minimal residual disease levels at the end of induction, 5‐year event‐free survival, and 5‐year cumulative incidence of relapse did not differ between both groups. Conclusion The efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of both asparaginase preparations are comparable. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00784017; EudraCT number 2006‐003180‐31.
机译:摘要背景,将重组大肠杆菌的疗效和安全性 - 氨基氨基酶(Rasnase)与天然E.coli天冬酰胺酶(天冬酰胺酶MEDAC)进行比较。方法方法是新诊断的新诊断急性淋巴细胞白血病的儿童随机分配,以在后导期(8剂量)和10,000u / m 2期间以5,000u / m 2的剂量在5,000 u / m 2期间接受其中一个药剂(仅高风险患者;标准和中风险患者接受PEGASPARGASE)。结果两个组之间的中位槽血清秋天酶活性水平;它们在诱导期间从143到182?U / L等于100?U / L的目标值。在97.9%的患者中,血清的完全芦笋耗竭,两组之间没有显着差异。在第33天(诱导结束),每组中只有两种(2%)评价患者可测量可测量的天冬酰胺血清水平,并且在脑脊液中的完全天冬酰胺耗竭在98.8%和93.6%的rasnase和芦笋酶medac患者中实现了脑脊液, 分别。在诱导过程中,2.1%和5%的患者分别对rasnase或天冬酰胺酶MEDAC产生过敏反应。两组患者的约41%的患者患有临床过敏或酶灭活,以便第一剂量的任何芦笋酶制剂在后导。两组患者的可比例比例在反复施用天冬酰胺酶期间抗天冬酰胺酶抗体(57%)。在归纳结束时,5年的无前活生存和5年的复发发病率的最小残留疾病水平在两组之间没有差异。结论天酰胺酶制剂的功效,安全性和免疫原性是可比性的。此审判在www.clinicaltrials.gov注册为#nct00784017; eudract 2006-003180-31。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号