首页> 外文期刊>Spectrochimica acta, Part A. Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy >Tea types classification with data fusion of UV-Vis, synchronous fluorescence and NIR spectroscopies and chemometric analysis
【24h】

Tea types classification with data fusion of UV-Vis, synchronous fluorescence and NIR spectroscopies and chemometric analysis

机译:茶叶类别分类,具有UV-VI,同步荧光和NIR光谱和化学计量分析的数据融合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The potential of selected spectroscopic methods - UV-Vis, synchronous fluorescence and NIR as well a data fusion of the measurements by these methods - for the classification of tea samples with respect to the production process was examined. Four classification methods - Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA), Regularized Discriminant Analysis (RDA) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) - were used to analyze spectroscopic data. PCA analysis was applied prior to classification methods to reduce multidimensionality of the data. Classification error rates were used to evaluate the performance of these methods in the classification of tea samples. The results indicate that black, green, white, yellow, dark, and oolong teas, which are produced by different methods, are characterized by different UV-Vis, fluorescence, and NIR spectra. The lowest error rates in the calibration and validation data sets for individual spectroscopies and data fusion models were obtained with the use of the QDA and SVM methods, and did not exceed 33% and 0.0%, respectively. The lowest classification error rates in the validation data sets for individual spectroscopies were obtained with the use of RDA (12,8%), SVM (6,7%), and QDA (2,7%), for the UV-Vis, SF, and NIR spectroscopies, respectively. NIR spectroscopy combined with QDA outperformed other individual spectroscopic methods. Very low classification errors in the validation data sets - below 3% - were obtained for all the data fusion data sets (SF + UV-Vis, SF + NIR, NIR + UV-Vis combined with the SVM method), The results show that UV-Vis, fluorescence and near infrared spectroscopies may complement each other, giving lower errors for the classification of tea types. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:检查了所选光谱法的潜力 - 通过这些方法对测量的测量数据融合 - 用于相对于生产过程的茶样品的分类,对紫外 - Vis,同步荧光和Nir进行了数据融合。四种分类方法 - 线性判别分析(LDA),二次判别分析(QDA),正规化判别分析(RDA)和支持向量机(SVM)用于分析光谱数据。在分类方法之前应用PCA分析,以减少数据的多征。分类错误率用于评估这些方法在茶样品分类中的性能。结果表明,由不同方法产生的黑色,绿色,白色,黄色,暗和乌龙茶,其特征在于不同的UV-Vis,荧光和NIR光谱。通过使用QDA和SVM方法获得各个光谱和数据融合模型的校准和验证数据集中的最低误差率,并且分别不超过33%和0.0%。通过使用RDA(12,8%),SVM(6,7%)和QDA(2,7%),获得验证数据集中的最低分类误差率,用于UV-Vis, SF和NIR光谱分别。 NIR光谱与QDA相结合优于其他单独的光谱方法。验证数据集中的非常低的分类误差 - 对于所有数据融合数据集(SF + UV-VI,SF + NIR,NIR + UV-VI,与SVM方法组合)获得了以下3% - UV-Vis,荧光和近红外光谱可以相互补充,给予茶叶分类的较低误差。 (c)2018年elestvier b.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号