...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chromatography, A: Including electrophoresis and other separation methods >The comparison of dispersive solid phase extraction and multi-plug filtration cleanup method based on multi-walled carbon nanotubes for pesticides multi-residue analysis by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry
【24h】

The comparison of dispersive solid phase extraction and multi-plug filtration cleanup method based on multi-walled carbon nanotubes for pesticides multi-residue analysis by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry

机译:液相色谱-串联质谱法分析基于多壁碳纳米管的分散固相萃取与多塞滤纯化方法对农药的多残留分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this study, dispersive-Solid Phase Extraction (d-SPE) cleanup and multi-plug filtration cleanup (m-PFC) methods were compared for 25 representative pesticides in six matrices (wheat, spinach, carrot, apple, citrus and peanut) by QuEChERS-LC-ESI-MS/MS detection. The type of sorbents in dispersive-SPE (d-SPE) was optimized for the above matrices. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), which mixed other materials like PSA (Primary Secondary Amines), GCB (Graphitized Carbon Black) and C18 (Octadecyl-silica), showed brilliant cleanup performance in multi residue monitoring (MRM) pesticide residue analysis. Cleanup effects with d-SPE and m-PFC methods were examined. When spiked at 3 concentration levels of 10, 100, 500 mu g/kg in above matrices, for both d-SPE and m-PFC methods, the recoveries ranged from 70 to 110% with relative standard deviations (RSDs) lower than 20%. Limits of quantification (LOQs) for both cleanup methods ranged from 1 to 25 mu g/kg. Matrix-matched calibrations were performed with the coefficients of determination more than 0.99 between concentration levels of 10-1000 mu g/kg. It was found that m-PFC was more convenient and effective than d-SPE with the same sorbents, due to the increased contact time and contact area between the extracts and compressed sorbents. The study demonstrated that m-PFC method could be used as a rapid, convenient and high-throughput cleanup method for analysis of pesticide residues. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在这项研究中,通过以下方法比较了六种基质(小麦,菠菜,胡萝卜,胡萝卜,苹果,柑橘和花生)中的25种代表性农药的分散固相萃取(d-SPE)净化和多塞过滤净化(m-PFC)方法。 QuEChERS-LC-ESI-MS / MS检测。针对上述基质优化了分散型SPE(d-SPE)中的吸附剂类型。多壁碳纳米管(MWCNT)混合了其他材料,例如PSA(主仲胺),GCB(石墨化炭黑)和C18(十八烷基硅石),在多残留物监测(MRM)农药残留分析中表现出出色的净化性能。检查了使用d-SPE和m-PFC方法的净化效果。在d-SPE和m-PFC方法中,在上述基质中以10、100、500μg/ kg的3种浓度水平加标时,回收率在70%至110%之间,相对标准偏差(RSD)低于20% 。两种净化方法的定量限(LOQ)为1至25μg / kg。在10-1000μg / kg的浓度水平之间,测定系数大于0.99进行基质匹配的校准。发现在相同吸附剂的情况下,m-PFC比d-SPE更方便和有效,这是因为萃取液和压缩吸附剂之间的接触时间和接触面积增加。研究表明,m-PFC方法可作为一种快速,方便,高通量的农药残留分析方法。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号