首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chromatography, A: Including electrophoresis and other separation methods >Variability of matrix effects in liquid and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of pesticide residues after QuEChERS sample preparation of different food crops
【24h】

Variability of matrix effects in liquid and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of pesticide residues after QuEChERS sample preparation of different food crops

机译:QuEChERS样品制备后液相色谱和气相色谱-农药残留分析中基质效应的变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Gas and liquid chromatography (GC and LC) coupled to mass spectrometry (MS) serve as the most powerful analytical tools commonly used to monitor pesticide residues in food, among other applications. However, both GC-MS and LC-MS are susceptible to matrix effects which can adversely affect quantification depending on the analyte, matrix, sample preparation, instrumentation, and operating conditions. Among the approaches that reduce matrix effects, the most common in pesticide residue applications is matrix-matched calibration because it is relatively inexpensive and simple. Also, it has been shown to work well during method validation when fortified samples are exactly matched with samples used for calibration. However, the quality of matrix-matched results in real-world analyses depends on the consistency of matrix effects among diverse samples. In this study, the variability of matrix effects was measured for 38 representative pesticides in 20 samples each (including different varieties) of rice, orange, apple, and spinach extracted using the "quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe" (QuEChERS) method for analysis by LC-MS/MS and low-pressure GC-MS. Using LC-MS/MS, only oranges gave >20% matrix effects for a few pesticides. GC-MS exhibited larger matrix effects, but as in LC-MS/MS, the differences were reasonably consistent among the 20 samples tested. Main conclusions of this study are that for the conditions utilized: (1) matrix-matching was not needed for most pesticides in the simpler food matrices; and (2) for the more complex orange matrix, acceptably accurate quantitative results were achieved by using matrix-matching even with a different sample of the same type. However, full confidence cannot be extended to matrix-matched results, and for consequential applications such as regulatory enforcement, confirmatory analyses using alternate quantitative determinations should also be conducted.
机译:气相色谱和液相色谱(GC和LC)与质谱(MS)结合使用,是最强大的分析工具,通常用于监控食品中的农药残留等。但是,GC-MS和LC-MS均易受基质效应的影响,这可能会对定量产生不利影响,具体取决于分析物,基质,样品制备,仪器和操作条件。在减少基质效应的方法中,农药残留应用中最常见的方法是基质匹配校准,因为它相对便宜且简单。而且,已证明当强化样品与用于校准的样品完全匹配时,它在方法验证期间效果很好。但是,实际分析中基质匹配结果的质量取决于不同样品之间基质效应的一致性。在这项研究中,使用“快速,简便,廉价,有效,坚固和安全”的方法,对米,橙,苹果和菠菜中的20种样品(包括不同品种)中的38种代表性农药的基质效应进行了测量。 (QuEChERS)方法进行LC-MS / MS和低压GC-MS分析。使用LC-MS / MS,只有橘子对某些农药产生的基质效应> 20%。 GC-MS表现出更大的基质效应,但与LC-MS / MS一样,所测试的20个样品之间的差异是合理一致的。这项研究的主要结论是对于所使用的条件:(1)在较简单的食品基质中,大多数农药不需要基质匹配; (2)对于更复杂的橙色基质,即使使用相同类型的不同样品,通过使用基质匹配也可以获得可接受的准确定量结果。但是,不能将完全的置信度扩展到与矩阵匹配的结果,并且对于相应的应用(例如法规执行),也应使用替代性的定量测定方法进行确认性分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号