首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chromatography, A: Including electrophoresis and other separation methods >Protein- versus peptide fractionation in the first dimension of two-dimensional high-performance liquid chromatography-matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization tandem mass spectrometry for qualitative proteome analysis of tissue samples
【24h】

Protein- versus peptide fractionation in the first dimension of two-dimensional high-performance liquid chromatography-matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization tandem mass spectrometry for qualitative proteome analysis of tissue samples

机译:二维高效液相色谱-基质辅助激光解吸/电离串联质谱的一维蛋白质和多肽分离技术,用于组织样品的定性蛋白质组分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The availability of robust and highly efficient separation methods represents a major requirement for proteome analysis. This study investigated the characteristics of two different gel-free proteomic approaches to the fractionation of proteolytic peptides and intact proteins, respectively, in a first separation dimension. Separation and mass spectrometric detection by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization tandem mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS/MS) were performed at the peptide level in both methods. Bottom-up analysis (BU) was carried out employing well established peptide fractionation in the first separation dimension by strong cation-exchange chromatography (SCX), followed by ion-pair reversed-phase chromatography (IP-RPC) in the second dimension. In the semi-top-down approach (STD), which involved intact protein fractionation in the first dimension, the separation mode in both dimensions was IP-RPC utilizing monolithic columns. Application of the two approaches to the proteome analysis of proteins extracted from a tumor tissue revealed that the BU method identified more proteins (1245 in BU versus 920 in STD) while STD analysis offered higher sequence coverage (14.8% in BU versus 17.5% in STD on average). The identification of more basic and larger proteins was slightly favored in the BU approach, most probably due to higher losses of these proteins during intact protein handling and separation in the STD method. A significant degree of complementarity was revealed by an approximately 33% overlap between one BU and STD replicate, while 33% each of the protein identifications were unique to both methods. In the STD method, peptides obtained upon digestion of the proteins contained in fractions of the first separation dimension covered a broad elution window in the second-dimension separation, which demonstrates a high degree of " pseudo-orthogonality" of protein and peptide separation by IP-RPC in both separation dimensions.
机译:强大而高效的分离方法的可用性代表了蛋白质组分析的主要要求。这项研究调查了两种不同的无凝胶蛋白质组学方法在第一分离维度上分别分离蛋白水解肽和完整蛋白的特性。两种方法均在肽水平上通过基质辅助激光解吸/电离串联质谱(MALDI-MS / MS)进行分离和质谱检测。自下而上的分析(BU)是使用强阳离子交换色谱(SCX)在第一分离维度上建立完善的肽分离技术,然后在第二维通过离子对反相色谱(IP-RPC)进行的。在第一维涉及完整蛋白质分级分离的半自顶向下方法(STD)中,两个维的分离模式均为利用整体柱的IP-RPC。两种方法对从肿瘤组织中提取的蛋白质进行蛋白质组分析的结果表明,BU方法可识别更多蛋白质(BU中1245,STD中920),而STD分析提供更高的序列覆盖率(BU中14.8%,STD中17.5%)一般)。在BU方法中,较基本和较大蛋白质的鉴定略受青睐,这很可能是由于在STD方法中完整蛋白质处理和分离过程中这些蛋白质的损失较高。一个BU和STD复制之间大约33%的重叠表明了很大程度的互补性,而每种方法的33%蛋白质鉴定都是这两种方法所独有的。在STD方法中,通过消化第一分离维级分中包含的蛋白质而获得的肽在第二维分离中覆盖了较宽的洗脱窗口,这证明了蛋白质的高度“拟正交性”和通过IP分离肽-RPC在两个分离维度上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号