...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Randomized International Phase III Trial of ERCC1 and RRM1 Expression-Based Chemotherapy Versus Gemcitabine/Carboplatin in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
【24h】

Randomized International Phase III Trial of ERCC1 and RRM1 Expression-Based Chemotherapy Versus Gemcitabine/Carboplatin in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

机译:ERCC1和RRM1表达为基础的化疗与吉西他滨/卡铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的国际随机III期试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE We assessed whether chemotherapy selection based on in situ ERCC1 and RRM1 protein levels would improve survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to the trial's experimental arm, which consisted of gemcitabine/carboplatin if RRM1 and ERCC1 were low, docetaxel/carboplatin if RRM1 was high and ERCC1 was low, gemcitabine/docetaxel if RRM1 was low and ERCC1 was high, and docetaxel/vinorelbine if both were high. In the control arm, patients received gemcitabine/carboplatin. The trial was powered for a 32% improvement in 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). Results Of 331 patients registered, 275 were eligible. The median number of cycles given was four in both arms. A tumor rebiopsy specifically for expression analysis was required in 17% of patients. The median time from informed consent to expression analysis was 11 days. We found no statistically significant differences between the experimental arm and the control arm in PFS (6.1 months v 6.9 months) or overall survival (11.0 months v 11.3 months). A subset analysis revealed that patients with low levels for both proteins who received the same treatment in both treatment arms had a statistically better PFS (P = .02) in the control arm (8.1 months) compared with the experimental arm (5.0 months). CONCLUSION This demonstrates that protein expression analysis for therapeutic decision making is feasible in newly diagnosed patients with advanced-stage NSCLC. A tumor rebiopsy is safe, required in 17%, and acceptable to 89% (47 of 53) of patients.
机译:目的我们评估了基于原位ERCC1和RRM1蛋白水平的化疗选择是否会改善晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的生存率。患者和方法将符合条件的患者按2:1的比例随机分配至试验的实验组,如果RRM1和ERCC1低,则由吉西他滨/卡铂;如果RRM1高和ERCC1低,则由多西他赛/卡铂;如果RRM1低和吉西他滨/多西他赛,则由吉西他滨/卡铂组成。 ERCC1高,多西他赛/长春瑞滨(如果两者均高)。在对照组,患者接受吉西他滨/卡铂治疗。该试验使6个月无进展生存期(PFS)改善了32%。结果登记的331名患者中,有275名符合条件。两组中给定的周期中位数为四个。 17%的患者需要专门进行表达分析的肿瘤活检。从知情同意到表达分析的中位时间为11天。我们发现实验组和对照组在PFS(6.1个月对6.9个月)或总生存期(11.0个月对11.3个月)之间没有统计学上的显着差异。子集分析显示,在两个治疗组中接受相同治疗的两种蛋白水平均较低的患者,与实验组(5.0个月)相比,对照组(8.1个月)的PFS统计学上更好(P = .02)。结论这表明在新诊断的晚期NSCLC患者中进行治疗性决策的蛋白表达分析是可行的。肿瘤活检是安全的,有17%的患者需要进行活检,并且89%(53中的47)患者可以接受。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号