首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Operator experience and carotid stenting outcomes in Medicare beneficiaries.
【24h】

Operator experience and carotid stenting outcomes in Medicare beneficiaries.

机译:Medicare受益人的操作员经验和颈动脉支架置入结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: Although the efficacy of carotid stenting has been established in clinical trials, outcomes of the procedure based on operator experience are less certain in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To assess association between outcomes and 2 measures of operator experience: annual volume and experience at the time of the procedure among new operators who first performed carotid stenting after a national coverage decision by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Observational study using administrative data on fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older undergoing carotid stenting between 2005 and 2007. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Thirty-day mortality stratified by very low, low, medium, and high annual operator volumes (<6, 6-11, 12-23, and >/=24 procedures per year, respectively) and treatment early vs late during a new operator's experience (1st to 11th procedure and 12th procedure or higher). RESULTS: During the study period, 24,701 procedures were performed by 2339 operators. Of these, 11,846 were performed by 1792 new operators who first performed carotid stenting after the CMS national coverage decision. Overall, 30-day mortality was 1.9% (n = 461) and rate of failure to use an embolic protection device was 4.8% (n = 1173). The median annual operator volume among Medicare beneficiaries was 3.0 per year (interquartile range, 1.4-6.5) and 11.6% of operators performed 12 or more procedures per year during the study period. Observed 30-day mortality was higher among patients treated by operators with lower annual volumes (2.5% [95% CI, 2.1%-2.9%], 1.9% [95% CI, 1.6%-2.3%], 1.6% [95% CI, 1.3%-1.9%], and 1.4% [95% CI, 1.1%-1.7%] across the 4 categories; P < .001) and among patients treated early (2.3%; 95% CI, 2.0%-2.7%) vs late (1.4%; 95% CI, 1.1%-1.9%; P < .001) during a new operator's experience. After multivariable adjustment, patients treated by very low-volume operators had a higher risk of 30-day mortality compared with patients treated by high-volume operators (adjusted odds ratio, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4-2.7; P < .001). Similarly, we found a higher risk of 30-day mortality in patients treated early vs late during a new operator's experience (adjusted odds ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.4; P = .001). CONCLUSION: Among older patients undergoing carotid stenting, lower annual operator volume and early experience are associated with increased 30-day mortality.
机译:背景:尽管在临床试验中已经确定了颈动脉支架置入术的有效性,但基于操作者经验的手术结果在临床实践中尚不确定。目的:评估结局与两种操作者经验指标之间的关联:在医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)决定在全国范围内作出决定之后,首次进行颈动脉支架置入术的新操作者中的年手术量和手术时的经验。设计,地点和患者:使用行政数据的观察性研究,研究对象为2005年至2007年间接受颈动脉支架置入术的65岁以上付费医疗保险受益人。以及每年较高的操作员数量(每年分别<6、6-11、12-23和> / = 24个程序),以及在新的操作员经验期间(第1至11个程序以及第12个或更高程序)尽早进行治疗。结果:在研究期间,由2339位操作者执行了24,701道手术。其中11846名患者是由1792名新操作员进行的,他们在CMS覆盖率决定后首次进行了颈动脉支架置入术。总体而言,30天死亡率为1.9%(n = 461),未使用栓塞防护装置的失败率为4.8%(n = 1173)。在研究期间,Medicare受益人的年度操作员中位数为每年3.0(四分位间距为1.4-6.5),并且11.6%的操作员每年执行12个或更多程序。年度手术量较低的手术治疗者观察到的30天死亡率更高(2.5%[95%CI,2.1%-2.9%],1.9%[95%CI,1.6%-2.3%],1.6%[95% CI,1.3%-1.9%]和1.4%[95%CI,1.1%-1.7%]; P <.001)和早期治疗的患者(2.3%; 95%CI,2.0%-2.7) %)对比后期(1.4%; 95%CI,1.1%-1.9%; P <.001)。经过多变量调整后,与使用大容量操作员治疗的患者相比,使用小容量操作员治疗的患者有30天死亡的风险更高(调整后的优势比为1.9; 95%CI为1.4-2.7; P <.001) 。同样,我们发现,在新操作员经历期间,早期治疗和晚期治疗的患者30天死亡的风险较高(调整后的优势比为1.7; 95%CI为1.2-2.4; P = .001)。结论:在接受颈动脉支架置入术的老年患者中,较低的年手术量和早期经验与30天死亡率增加有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号