首页> 外文期刊>The pharmaceutical journal >Action or just warm words?
【24h】

Action or just warm words?

机译:行动还是热烈的话?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ALONGSIDE 26 other health organisations, the Royal Pharmaceutical Society and the General Pharmaceutical Council are signatories to a charter just launched by NHS Employers (p418). "Speaking up" outlines a commitment by these organisations — royal colleges, professional bodies, trade unions and regulators — to work with employers to support staff when they raise a concern or safety issue at work. Can such a document make a real difference in practice or is it merely a vehicle for warm words? Signatories have pledged to work to create a just culture — something particularly close to the heart of the RPS, which has been campaigning on this front for many months. The charter emphasises that such a culture would lead to increased reporting and sharing of incidents, and improve practice. It also states that individuals providing care services should always feel free to raise concerns through local processes. What's not to like?
机译:在其他26个卫生组织中,皇家制药协会和通用制药理事会也是NHS雇主刚刚发布的宪章的签署人(p418)。 “讲话”概述了这些组织(皇家学院,专业机构,工会和监管机构)的承诺,即在雇主提出工作中的关注或安全问题时与雇主合作以支持员工。这样的文件可以在实践中产生真正的改变吗?还是仅仅是热烈话语的载体?签署方已承诺要努力创造一种公正的文化,这特别接近RPS的核心,而RPS在这方面已开展了许多个月的运动。该章程强调,这种文化将导致更多的事件报告和共享,并改善实践。它还指出,提供护理服务的个人应始终随时可以通过当地程序提出疑虑。不喜欢什么?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号