首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Prandial inhaled insulin plus basal insulin glargine versus twice daily biaspart insulin for type 2 diabetes: a multicentre randomised trial.
【24h】

Prandial inhaled insulin plus basal insulin glargine versus twice daily biaspart insulin for type 2 diabetes: a multicentre randomised trial.

机译:对于2型糖尿病,餐后吸入胰岛素加基础胰岛素甘精胰岛素与每日两次偏头痛胰岛素的比较:一项多中心随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Insulin therapy is often a delayed strategy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus because it is associated with weight gain, hypoglycaemia, and the need for subcutaneous injections. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of prandial Technosphere inhaled insulin compared with twice daily biaspart insulin. METHODS: In this randomised, open-label, parallel-group study, adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and poor glycaemic control despite insulin therapy, with or without oral antidiabetes drugs, were enrolled from ten countries between Feb 23, 2006, and Aug 8, 2007. Patients were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive 52 weeks' treatment with: prandial Technosphere inhaled insulin powder plus bedtime insulin glargine; or twice daily premixed biaspart insulin (70% insulin aspart protamine suspension and 30% insulin aspart of rDNA origin). The primary endpoint was a comparison of change in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) from baseline to week 52 between treatment groups; the non-inferiority margin was 0.4%. Analysis was by per protocol for non-inferiority testing of the primary endpoint. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00309244. FINDINGS: 334 patients were allocated to inhaled insulin plus insulin glargine, and 343 to biaspart insulin; 107 patients on inhaled insulin plus insulin glargine and 85 on biaspart insulin discontinued the trial. 211 patients on inhaled insulin plus insulin glargine and 237 on biaspart insulin were included in per-protocol analyses. Change in HbA(1c) with inhaled insulin plus insulin glargine (-0.68%, SE 0.077, 95% CI -0.83 to -0.53) was similar and non-inferior to that with biaspart insulin (-0.76%, 0.071, -0.90 to -0.62). The between-group difference was 0.07% (SE 0.102, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.27). Patients had significantly lower weight gain and had fewer mild-to-moderate and severe hypoglycaemic events on inhaled insulin plus insulin glargine than on biaspart insulin. The safety and tolerability profile was similar for both treatments, apart from increased occurrence of cough and change in pulmonary function in the group receiving inhaled insulin plus insulin glargine. INTERPRETATION: This study is part of a large clinical development programme addressing the efficacy and tolerability of use of Technosphere inhaled insulin in a wide variety of patients. FUNDING: MannKind.
机译:背景:在2型糖尿病患者中,胰岛素治疗通常是一种延迟策略,因为它与体重增加,低血糖症以及需要皮下注射有关。我们旨在评估与每日两次偏头痛胰岛素相比,餐后Technosphere吸入胰岛素的功效和安全性。方法:在这项随机,开放标签,平行组研究中,从2006年2月23日至8月之间从十个国家招募了成年2型糖尿病患者,尽管有胰岛素治疗,但有或没有口服降糖药,其血糖控制不佳。 2007年8月8日。以1:1的比例随机分配患者,接受52周的治疗:餐后Technosphere吸入胰岛素粉加睡前甘精胰岛素;或每天两次预混的偏置组分胰岛素(70%的门冬胰岛素和鱼精蛋白悬浮液和30%的门冬胰岛素作为rDNA来源)。主要终点是比较治疗组之间从基线到第52周糖化血红蛋白(HbA(1c))的变化。非劣质性优势为0.4%。按照协议分析主要终点的非劣效性。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,编号为NCT00309244。结果:334例患者被分配了吸入胰岛素加甘精胰岛素,343例被分配了胰岛素。 107例吸入胰岛素加甘精胰岛素的患者和85例偏斜胰岛素的患者中止了试验。按方案分析包括211例吸入胰岛素加甘精胰岛素的患者和237例偏斜胰岛素的患者。吸入胰岛素加甘精胰岛素(-0.68%,SE 0.077,95%CI -0.83至-0.53)的HbA(1c)变化与偏头痛胰岛素(-0.76%,0.071,-0.90至-0.62)。组间差异为0.07%(SE 0.102,95%CI -0.13至0.27)。与偏斜胰岛素组相比,吸入胰岛素加甘精胰岛素组患者的体重增加显着降低,轻度至中度和重度降血糖事件较少。两种治疗的安全性和耐受性相似,除了吸入胰岛素加甘精胰岛素组的咳嗽发生增加和肺功能改变。解释:这项研究是一项大型临床开发计划的一部分,该计划针对在各种患者中使用Technosphere吸入胰岛素的功效和耐受性。资金:MannKind。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号